Friday, October 15, 2010

Farscape S1 Ep4: Throne For A Loss

"One of our intentions is to never let the series stay in the same place for any length of time, to change the dynamics." -David Kemper [Starburst #257]-

GULP! Who needs naked green women when you have naked blue women. Star Trek: The Original Series just lost the corner on the market.

*
Things are beginning to heat up on Farscape. While it may not be firing on all cylinders yet, Farscape Season One is by far more aggressively entertaining than Star Trek: The Next Generation Season One ever was by a long shot. John Crichton is easily our human representative. He's our eyes and ears as we venture into this weird and wonderful universe. The series has captivated me beyond my wildest expectations. If the initial trio of episodes was the perfect firestarter and introduction to the science fiction supernova that was Farscape, the science fiction deconstructions continue to get interesting with this fourth installment. Farscape, Season One, Episode 4, Throne For A Loss begins to break slightly from convention and shakes things up with some weird and new twists on the genre. In a universe like a place called Farscape, your science fiction mind should expect it to be slightly out there. The Henson team has really created something special. I feel like Farscape was made for me. It may be made for the unconventional 'you' too. In fact, it's the series' ability to wrap the unconventional and conventional into an eclectic mix that keeps one off kilter without alienating [how appropriate] the viewer.
*
What fascinates me as I sink deeper into the series is my affection and love for the characters. Most notably, Ben Browder [John Crichton] and Claudia Black [Aeryn Sun] are a sheer joy to watch and develop in a way that I did not experience with them when I watched Stargate SG-1 Season Nine and Ten. I've mentioned this before, but I have to credit the writers and the actors [Browder and Black] for creating two characters on SG-1 that are dramatically different from those portrayed in Farscape. I remember watching SG-1 and hearing critics scoff at the arrival of Browder and Black to the franchise and essentially playing the same roles they graced in Farscape within SG-1 and amusingly referring to the series as Fargate. Nothing could be further from the truth. While the components are there for both series they are uniquely portrayed. I look forward to seeing their work in SG-1 down the road again when I've completed the Farscape journey to note the differences between their respective parts. These actors deserve credit for bringing their distinct roles to life in both series.
*
Throne For A Loss also initiates one of the most exciting aspects of the series with the Jim Henson Creature Shop creations. The aliens in the fourth installment are the first truly interesting looking aliens to be spotlighted. Creature designer Dave Elsey had some vivid, choice words about the series and what the group was achieving each week in Farscape: The Illustrated Companion. "I really like the fact that Farscape is a very alien show, so that everything is weird and bizarre, apart from Crichton." Certainly he has his moments too. "You'd think that sci-fi, being an imaginative thing, would take chances, but most sci-fi shows are very conservative and safe, and there are lots of rules that go along with them. Farscape throws those away. The characters are seriously flawed- they've got some seriously messed up aliens who weren't picked up enough as children!" Off we go with the wonderfully weird and bizarre of Farscape.
*
A shuttle arrives on Moya with a handful of Tavlek warriors. The crew of Moya greets them at an entrance, but not before bickering amongst one another like... like family. The crew is greeted by three hideously deformed Tavlek warriors and they are informed, "move and you die." The diplomatic Pa'u Zotoh Zhaan attempts an intervention, but is fired upon. A rousing skirmish ensues as the alien lifeforms appear impervious thanks to armband-styled weapons that adorn their armor. The devices are capable of firing intense plasma-like laser bursts and can even create force fields. It's an interesting sequence, because the camera is sped up by two-time Farscape Director Pino Amenta [I, E.T.] to give the impression of a race souped up on a steroid-like drug. We're about to find out why. In the ensuing melee Dominar Rygel XVI is kidnapped and clearly by design. Crichton knocks one of the lifeforms down and the creature's arm device is knocked loose as a series of needles recede back inside the device. The arm weapon appears equipped with a liquid tube of bubbling chemicals or some kind of alien drug or steroid. Ka D'Argo attempts to place it on his arm, but nothing happens as he hollers "JUNK!" Crichton yells to Pilot to seal the bay doors, but two creatures escape with Rygel. Farscape is ON!
*
Crichton pleads with Pilot to get a "tractor beam" [no doubt raised and reared on Star Wars] on the escaping vessel, but Pilot has no idea what the hell Crichton is talking about. A tractor beam!? This is the wonderful gift of Farscape and its natural infusion of the fish-out-of-water elements without being annoyingly obvious. Terrific, classic fun. The beam that pulled Crichton aboard in Premiere is actually a "docking wave." Here's that exchange since it's too damn funny to pass up.

*
No, that can't be good at all. That is hilarious! Ben Browder completely channels my every human reaction to the many bizarre scenarios he is thrust into on Farscape. Like any powerful drug, D'Argo's already hot-headed temper is becoming all the more inflamed as he challenges his new found friends for the role of ship leader. Bad tempers lead to on board laser fire to boot. Remember, cooler heads always prevail.
*
Meanwhile, the detained alien warrior is conscious once again after being deserted and left behind on Moya. Sun and Crichton attempt to find out more regarding this weapon-like "stimulant." Crichton calls it a bit more than "cappuccino." Sun and Crichton deduce the weapon can only be removed if the occupier of the weapon is knocked unconscious. This clever turn is meant to protect warriors in battle from losing their arms to the enemy along with the arm weapons. D'Argo is running around the ship kicking DRDs and barking orders like a real Luxan ass. He even threatens to rip off all of Pilot's arms [sadly, no idle threat and a component of which rings of some truth down the road in Farscape].
*
The aliens communicate to Moya from the planet below making their demands for their obnoxious, Hynerian hostage. Getting their boy warrior back isn't quite enough. They want some precious resources, but Sun assures them they won't be able to help. The crew of Moya is given one solar day to comply. Why not just one day? Why not hour instead of arn? Would the Translator Microbes not take care of all of this frellin' nonsense? Just thinking. Zhaan gives Crichton a "water balloon" to take out D'Argo. Unfortunately, the mist balloon starts to work, but then simply can't finish the job or bring down the Luxan. D'Argo's stimulant weapon adapts and makes adjustments injecting him with a punch of adrenaline. He pursues Sun and Crichton through Moya's halls like a Stormtrooper chasing Han Solo through the Death Star.
*
Crichton requests some help from Pilot looking for thrust from Moya, but it's simply not available. This is one of the wonderful elements to the series' concept of the living vessel. Moya is a wonderful ship design, but being alive, nothing is automatic and the group runs into problems with ship systems regularly like the Moonbase Alphans ran into problems finding solutions through Computer on Space:1999. These refreshing angles offer a whole host of unexpected twists and turns. It forces the crew and our hero Crichton to get creative allowing the creative team behind Farscape new avenues for their clever science fiction ideas and designs. Wonderful stuff.
*
Meanwhile, following some impressive special effects that might be considered vintage at this point, Zhaan escorts their prisoner to a containment room. The Tavlek creature tells Zhaan she's "soft and weak." Zhaan quickly handles the chum and informs him, "soft - yes, weak - no." Go Zhaan! Zhaan has some wonderful character bits sprinkled throughout each episode and remains one of the most interesting supporting characters of this fascinating crew. Pilot informs Zhaan Crichton has an "idea." Zhaan is concerned and mutters some Delvian curses under her breath. I didn't understand them because apparently I never received my Translator Microbes at birth.

The second official moment of physical contact between these two handsome leads.
Elsewhere on Moya, Crichton and Sun play a game of cat and mouse to subdue D'Argo and obtain his newly acquired energy weapon. Crichton calls for Pilot's thruster propulsion at just the right critical moment to shift D'Argo off balance. D'Argo is knocked down and unconscious as planned. Sun winds up falling on top of Crichton for a second time since their last physical connection in Farscape, Season One, Episode 2, I, E.T. when they landed in each other's arms. There is something incredibly hot about their relationship, but something tells me my affection for brunettes, in particular Sun, has got me hook line and sinker. She is Sebacean HOT! I'm not sure what that means, but it sounds good.
*
On the planet below, a terrific alien score with grinding guitars signals foreign ground and the encampment of the well-armored alien soldiers. You'll note some impressive production details as the local fauna is bright blue and green. It's positively freaky and it's this level of detail that really sets Farscape apart from a number of alien-based science fiction programs. For example, Stargate SG-1 often appeared to be filming in British Columbia because they were and early on in that series there was little accomplished to hide that fact in external shots with exceptions. Farscape changes up the details and places more interest in the minutia of those set designs. I wholeheartedly approve. Rygel is imprisoned by the "barbarians" as he calls them and he is waste deep in mud! Yes, mud! I am beginning to understand why Rygel hates mud so much as he spoke so eloquently of it in Farscape, Season One, Episode Two, I, E.T.. Rygel hates mud! I suspect the Hynerian race hates mud. It's a clever idea and this bit of information offers a little more insight into why exactly with a tangible example. So, while in prison, Rygel XVI gets into a little cross-alien smack talk with an alien that hails from the Consortium of Trau. Rygel informs the creature- a green-tentacled, gorgeous creation from the Jim Henson Creature Shop- that he oversees 600 billion subjects. The Trau creature betters the arrogant Rygel by emphasizing he oversees 10,000 planets averaging 4 billion Trau per planet. Rygel expresses disbelief, but the creature may potentially be more arrogant than Rygel [if that's possible] himself. Rygel's verbal shock is given the succint Trau arrogance of, "the imperfection is yours." Rygel looks down sadly stuck in the mud. Poor Rygel. I actually felt some sympathy for him. The Rygel character is fascinating that way. You will quickly alternate between disdain and affection for Rygel at any given moment through a Farscape installment.
*
Meanwhile, back on Moya, Crichton and Sun learn Rygel borrowed a vital component of Moya's control circuitry. Rygel wanted to borrow it, but Pilot forbade him. Rygel took it anyway. So much for leaving Rygel behind as suggested by D'Argo. Following Pilot's description of the object, Crichton realizes Rygel took the decorative red ball to adorn his ornate scepter. The crystal is needed to maintain Moya's safe distance from the planet, which is quickly deteriorating. Sun informs John she has a plan. Do shows get any more brilliant in writing and entertainment value than this scene?

*
I love Crichton's reference to the aliens as "Tabloids" rather than Tavleks. What a well-handled, natural scene! What a punch! There is certainly a breezy, fast and loose chemistry between Sun and Crichton that reminsces of fiery relationships like Princess Leia and Han Solo.
Zhaan visits the young alien Tavlek in the holding room who attempts to rattle Zhaan with a sexual game. I love the open and unabashed love for sex and other sexual suggestions in the series. Nothing is overdone or gratuitous, but it's fearless in letting it all hang out. The Tavlek creature derobes and attempts to embarass Zhaan. She merely smiles and simply returns the gesture by exposing her front side to him and exposing her rear to the viewer. As a result, the alien is uncomfortable as Zhaan belittles him by asking him if a naked body is taboo in his culture. Zhaan, played by Virgina Hey, has a wonderful backside. She's gorgeous, blue paint and all.
*
Down on the colorful planet, painstakingly decorated by production staff, Sun has attired herself with the Tavlek gear. She indicates a number of lethal possibilities that may lay ahead on the planet's surface including Moyan Death Spiders. Sounds interesting, maybe we'll run into one along the way. Could they be native to the Leviathan race? As Crichton and Sun make their way to the encampment, Rygel makes every effort to free himself from the mud. His characteristic, insatiable appetite has his stomach grumbling. Rygel is presented with a bowl of grub inside an empty skull. It's notable that behind alll of Rygel's tough talk is clearly a sometimes insecure, frightened little Hynerian. We all have a little Rygel in us.
*
Sun and Crichton happen upon a Tavlek hunting party. Sun dons the Tavlek garb [taken with them and from the Tavlek prisoner aboard Moya] and places the weapon on her arm. The effect is instantly potent as Sun clearly feels the buzz of the armband's stimulant rush within her bloodstream. Clearly the Sebacean's do respond adversely to its effects. With helmet on, Sun makes her play to find out where Rygel is located. She engages in a bit of a physical struggle to extract the information from one of the three Tavleks. Crichton worries for her and picks up her weapon. Not knowing how to use it, the weapon overloads and explodes. Seriously, how often do you find a science fiction series whereby the hero picks up a weapon, but isn't certain how to use it? Sure things never went quite as planned on Star Trek: The Original Series or Space:1999 when it came to technology, but Farscape packs a certain comic zip. It's a rare thing, but makes complete sense. It's one of the brilliant things about Farscape. Nothing goes quite as planned. The Tavleks scatter frightened by the explosion.
*
On Moya, Pilot picks up the explosion and D'Argo grabs a shuttle heading to the planet to find Sun and Crichton. On the planet, Sun can't believe Crichton overloaded the pulse chamber, which caused the explosion. In the encampment's prison, the Tavlek inform the Trau prisoner ransom is enroute and he will be free to go upon its arrival. The Trau expected nothing less. Rygel, though talking tough again, isn't so certain his ransom will come through. There is an aspect of fragility to Rygel's character on display in the scene. There are moments in the series that really touch you and give you pause with these characters. They are all written with true reactions, even a muppet like Rygel. Rygel is authentic and meticulously handled injecting the series with real humor, emotion and vulnerabilities like any live action actor might provide.
*
They even look as smart as Stormtroopers.
On Moya the alien visitor is getting stir crazy. Again, he attempts to attack Zhaan who bleeds blue-white blood. Her empathic tendencies relieve the alien's withdrawl pains. Her abilities remind me of the character Raven from The New Teen Titans comic book circa 1980.
*
On the planet, a Tavlek warrior dumps a bowl of soup in front of Rygel who attempts to use it to free himself by loosening the soil. Meanwhile, Sun and Crichton feud over the armband. Crichton wants it off her arm. Sun, like D'Argo, is expressing a desire to retain it essentially demonstrating its influence over its subject like a habit or drug. D'Argo enters the fray and goads Sun to take him on in physical combat. Sun clearly forgets about that extending Luxan tongue. Now in close proximity, she is knocked unconscious and the gauntlet is released from her arm.
*
In the prison, Rygel breaks free with help from the Trau. Unfortunately in his escape, Rygel is killed. Yes, he's killed, accept the Trau apparently has life-giving powers [whew! lucky for Rygel it wasn't an imprisoned Luxan then] and essentially breathes life back into the Hynerian via tentacle. If ransom is not paid by Rygel's people, the Trau indicates his race will pay for him. The Trau alludes to Rygel's intergalactic acclaim as being something important. Like siblings of a sort, D'Argo, Crichton and Sun bicker as Sun recovers. You can see the competetive streak in these characters.

*
In the prison cell, life isn't going so well for Rygel. Following his revival, he is now buried neck deep in mud. It's so pathetic to see, it's actually funny, but given Rygel resembles a toad and toads have a tendency to hop away, it makes sense to isolate the Hynerian for good measure in mud. At the same time, the Trau informs Rygel he is now a subject of the Trau Consortium, as are Rygel's subjects, since it was he who revived Rygel. It's becoming clear that the Trau are kind of hive-like creature a la the Borg, endlessly absorbing races and forcing compliance. How those races are subjugated remains a mystery. Rygel sort of has the last laugh by giving the Trau the bad news. Rygel tells the creature he was deposed cycles ago and all the Trau actually gets is him. The growling creature is pissed when he learns no one will ransom him, not even his crew who Rygel suspects "hate" him. This illustrates Rygel's very sensitive side. This is brilliantly equal parts pathetic and sympathetic all in one.

*
Crichton spots the encampment and is goes in. D'Argo's sword doubles as a firing weapon. It is a gun-sword hybrid dubbed the Qualta Blade. Back on Moya, the Tavlek prisoner inquires as to what Zhaan is exactly. This question results in a rather interesting answer later. She obviously contains some remarkable healing powers. He wonders how she took his pain away. Zhaan is a Delvian Pa'u, a priest in the 9th level. Zhaan has a special scene with the creature that begs the question of who we are without the influence of others, external factors and environment. It begs the question of nurture versus nature. In this case, the creature is without his gauntlet and Zhaan wonders if he is not more than that, which he believes to be what makes him.
*
*
Crichton and D'Argo move into the encampment while the Tavlek sleep. They enter the prison for one of the knee-slapping, funniest moments in the episode.

*
"Check out the critter!" Is that not the funniest!? Farscape is cool and fun in one. I love it! The critter informs Crichton and D'Argo that Rygel is being relocated to a more secure location thanks to the Trau's efforts. As the two exit, they are encountered by the tricky camera work of Director Pino Amenta, a couple of Tavlek, their savior Sun and an ensuing battle complete with laser fire. It's electric! D'Argo takes a direct hit by a gauntlet's fire. He is bleeding profusely. Sun immediately begins pounding on D'Argo's back applying an intense battering to the wound. Crichton is shocked and halts her actions. She insists, a Luxan's wound must run clear and the only way to stop the infection and the bleeding is to get the wound to drain clear by applying tremendous force. She resumes out of concern.
*
On Moya, Zhaan finishes another meeting with the Tavlek prisoner whom she has relinquished a level of trust. She is called by Pilot to scan the planet for a Tavlek shuttle [the one preparing to leave with Rygel]. She reports the coordinates of the planned shuttle departure to Crichton and company. Upon Zhaan's exit, the young Tavlek is roaming the ship freely and attacks one of the DRDs. Pilot is none too happy given the DRDs act as Moya's red and white corpuscles as part of Moya's natural or synthetic defenses.
*
So Crichton clamps the gauntlet to his arm to expedite his ability to get to the site of the shuttle before its departure. He equates the gauntlet to Green Lantern's ring for the third pop culture reference in the episode.
*
On Moya, Zhaan puts the Tavlek prisoner in his place and stops shy of kicking his ass while teaching him a lesson about drug addiction.
*
Crichton reaches Rygel who is in a bag and escorted by four Tavleks. Crichton takes out three of them with his super gauntlet. When he takes on the final Tavlek, Bakesh, he realizes he's out of stimulant and attempts diplomacy and reason by calling the fight a draw hoping he won't call his bluff. He insists the Tavleks don't want Rygel because he's not a king, but rather an "escape mental patient with delusions of royalty. " Rygel pipes in from his bag, "You're the escape mental patient!" The humor is just off the charts funny. See for yourself!

*
Bakesh calls Moya to ask the young Tavlek if there are "riches" on board. The young Tavlek mutters he won't lie for them, but Zhaan tells him they never asked him to. The young Tavlek tells Bakesh the place is "pathetic" and that they have treated him well. Crichton insists he's telling him the truth. Bakesh delivers one of the most heartfelt lines through his disgustingly ugly prosthetics and I couldn't help think of myself and how I see people in my own life at times. "Been so long since anyone's told me the truth, I don't recognize it anymore." Do you ever feel that way sometimes? I suppose it's a bit of the psychological damage we all suffer as we age. As we grow older, we are more jaded and certainly less open. It's actually hard to remain open, but it's rewarding with the effort. Bakesh releases Rygel with a swift kick sliding him over to Crichton. Crichton asks for the crystal. Rygel, with his tough guy act back in full effect, says he knew they didn't come back just for him. He tells Crichton he swallowed the gem and that he must return to the ship or be disembowelled on the spot. "Don't you tempt me Fluffy," a frustrated Crichton replies. Meanwhile, Sun has got D'Argo's wound running clear. Crichton passes out crashing to the ground from the drug's withdrawl landing straight on top of Rygel, who is clearly the recipient of intense physical punishment this entry.
Back at Moya, Rygel passes the crystal - as in, out his Hynerian pooper! Rygel is so wicked and so gross. You just gotta love him.

*
In the end, Zhaan communicates with the Tavlek. Zhaan clearly established a connection with him and he with her. Despite some breakthroughs, the creature informs her he has returned to his gauntlet-driven lifestyle. No longer clean, he is once again a hostage to external substance. The entry ends fittingly with "No sermons."
*
Throne For A Loss: B
Writer: Richard Manning
Director: Pino Amenta
*
Pop Culture Reference: Crichton: "We do know that they will pay us to hall cargo, which they're not gonna do if you go in there doing your John Wayne impression." Sun: "John Wayne - who's that? A relative?" Crichton: "John Wayne? Oh, the big guy. True Grit. The Searchers. The Cowboys. Ghengis Khan. No, look, forget about Ghengis Khan, everybody makes a bad movie."
*
There are several pop culture references within Throne For A Loss [great Farscape title as always]. The beauty in the pop culture references is that John Crichton says these things for us. The crew of Moya is clueless to any given reference. Beyond us, Crichton makes these remarks for himself. They ground him. They keep him connected to home. They maintain those things we hold dear- the things that keep us all sane.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Cutting Crew: Broadcast

Unfortunately I'm showing my age with my latest entry in what I hope will be the first in a series of retrospectives showcasing the best of the 80s CD classics.

iTunes is certainly an option, but being a fan of the best in audio-visual quality I prefer Blu-Ray films or Remastered CDs to the digital download as my weapon of choice. This applies to those things that I consider classic. I do download from time to time and more so than ever nowadays, but there are certain classic discs that must reside in the personal library. Call it the collection needed for that desert island if you will. I must feel them. I must touch them. I must leaf through the liner notes. I must be able to smell the artwork in all of its glory. It sounds like I have a problem. I don't know, perhaps. Call it old school, but liner notes and vintage classics [obviously subjective] are some of the wonderful things in this life.

To be honest, growth in my CD collection has slowed significantly and has essentially halted with the exception of the occasional remaster that is often unavailable in the United States, but is available by import only through the UK or Europe in general. Most of my CD collection has even lost value as far as ebay potential goes, but such is life.

A little nod to Lazy Thoughts Of A Baby Boomer who inspired me or reignited that fire in me to embrace my love of music for the random post here. Musings Of A Sci-Fi Fanatic is almost exclusively science fiction for obvious reasons, but one cannot live by bread alone. The 80s is part of who I am, why not open it up a bit here?

For my first official look back at the classics of the 1980s I turn to Broadcast [1986] by Cutting Crew. My support is exclusively for Cutting Crew's Broadcast, which is hands down a classic from beginning to end. The original recording was remastered in 2010 and is the one recording by the band that is an absolute library must own. There isn't a bad selection in the collection. The obvious hits included (I Just) Died In Your Arms [US number one], One For The Mocking Bird [US top 40] and the gorgeous ballad I've Been In Love Before [US Top 10]. But to qualify for an entry on this blog you have to be classic from beginning to end [with the exception of maybe one track misstep] and Broadcast achieves this status.

The Cutting Crew is an English-based band led by singer/songwriter Nick Van Eede. The act followed-up Broadcast three years later with The Scattering [1989] also remastered in 2010. It's amazing how a band can lose its rhythm with the passage of just a few years. That recording, apart from Everything But My Pride, essentially a retread of I've Been In Love Before, is a lost opportunity and weak effort for the band. Somewhere between 1986 and 1989 the group lost its way and its knack for melody and formula for a good, old-fashioned, catchy, pop song.

This was followed by their third, straight-to-the-bargain-bin outing Compus Mentus [1992] and much later Grinning Souls [2006]. At this point, fans had scattered and again, Eede had lost his touch.

For one classic moment, the stars had aligned for the group, lightning was captured in a bottle and an unforgettable recording called Broadcast was realized forever. Broadcast is a wonderful selection of songs and is essential. Let's be clear and cut to the chase, Broadcast is the only recording worth repeat listening. The UK Remaster offers the following songs including several bonus tracks: Any Colour, One For The Mocking Bird, I've Been In Love Before, Life In A Dangerous Time, Fear Of Falling, (I Just) Died In Your Arms, Don't Look Back, Sahara, It Shouldn't Take Too Long, The Broadcast + (I Just) Died In Your Arms [12" Mix], I've Been In Love Before [Live In London], The Broadcast/ Any Colour [Live In USA], For The Longest Time [b-side to (I Just) Died In Your Arms].

Sahara is a ballad of spare beauty, but I cannot say enough about the classic production techniques of songs like this one as well as Any Colour, The Broadcast and Don't Look Back. Production always plays a key part in the resulting sound. Producers can make the difference- a kind of unsung hero and extension of the band for an outing. The producers were Steve Thompson, Terry Brown, John Jansen and Michael Barbiero and the final achievement, a rare feat with so many hands in the proverbial pot, was pop perfection.

If you're a fan of the best of 1980s music, Cutting Crew's Broadcast is a classic and ranks up there with the best of Tears For Fears in style a la vintage Songs From The Big Chair [1985]. There were a host of bands that arrived on the scene and whilst Cutting Crew never had that combination of talent, luck and management to pull off a lengthy career, the necessary ingredients were in place to cut a major classic. There was simply something about the period and the recording process of the day that generated something special. Broadcast is simply one of the best of 1986. You'll never tire of these dulcet pop tunes. Remember, this isn't about being a fan of the Cutting Crew or a follower of any of its members. It's really not. I have no idea what they are doing now, but this is about recognizing a classic recording that delivers on repeat play to this day. It's also by the Cutting Crew and they deserve credit for being in the right frame of mind with their talent, energy and ideas at just the right time. Why should a classic from the '80s be relegated to unimportant simply by virtue of its time of arrival? I know it's easy to shrug off bands that are reduced in importance or quickly boxed up as one-hit wonders by the music critics, but acts like Cutting Crew made some good music for a time and carved their place in '80s history. Thanks for the still special Broadcast.

BONUS TRACKS: It's also worth noting, the updated UK remaster addition features five exceptional bonus selections rounding out the classic Broadcast CD at 15 tracks. These bonus selections are also in keeping with the overall sound and style of the Broadcast-era Cutting Crew work. For The Longest Time is splendid as incorporated b-sides go and apart from a solid 12-inch version of (I Just) Died In Your Arms, the true highlights of the bonus selections are three exceptional live tracks from the period including I've Been In Love Before [Live In London], The Broadcast/ Any Colour [Live In The USA]. These live renditions offer three of the outing's finest songs a nice twist and energy apart from the studio. These numbers are one more reason why this is a must own for the pop library.

Cutting Crew Discography:
Broadcast [1986] *
The Scattering [1989]
Compus Mentis [1992]
The Best Of Cutting Crew [2003]
Grinning Souls [2006]

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Starman

"We are very civilized, but we have lost something. You are all so much alive, so different. I will miss the cooks and the dancing and the singing and the eating" - Starman-
*
I know. It comes as no surprise, predictable even, that The Sci-Fi Fanatic should go ahead and select Director John Carpenter's Starman [1984] for the official Radiator Heaven John Carpenter Week blogathon. My efforts to select a John Carpenter film were pained, a bit tortured even. Carpenter's filmography is so strong it was hard to select just one. But, as love stories go Starman may be perfect. In some ways, Starman is the anecdote, or the anti-Carpenter, a far more hopeful and pretty picture than we are normally accustomed to seeing from THE Man.
*
Carpenter's The Thing [1982] is one of those films that shaped my childhood. Escape From New York [1981] was another of his classics. Finally, Big Trouble In Little China [1986] concludes a trilogy of some of Kurt Russell's finest work, all with auteur John Carpenter. These were films that resonate with me today. My love and affection for the Russell/Carpenter marriage began with their ABC film Elvis [1979]. Those Russell films aside Carpenter has delivered a long line of essential pictures. Assault On Precinct 13 [1976], Halloween [1978] and The Fog [1980] with Jamie Lee Curtis, Prince Of Darkness [1987], They Live [1988] and In The Mouth Of Madness [1995] with Sam Neill are generally high on any fan's film list. His work has been the inspiration of endless remakes and/or riffs of his work, likewise Howard Hawks and others have served as Carpenter's inspiration. For a wonderful appreciation of Carpenter's rich history be sure to check out Author John Kenneth Muir's The Films Of John Carpenter [2000]. It's a tough book to put down.
*
I was torn on what to discuss here. There is, of course, Prince Of Darkness [1987]. This was a film I visited while in theatres and about ran me out of the cinema because it was so damned frightening. I wasn't sure I could articulate just how damn disturbing that film was to me. Perhaps someday I will, but when the character, played by Lisa Blount, was controlled by Satan my heart was breaking. When she ever reached into that mirror to take Satan's hand and bring the realization of evil to apocalyptic fruition I was paralyzed. Finally, pushed through the mirror to the underworld, with the mirror broken, we had the image of Blount sinking in some kind of evil, primordial fluid being pulled down by her master. What left such a mark on me with that film was that the Lisa Blount character appeared to awaken from her Satanic control. Her hand outstretched pleading for help back toward the mirror, the doorway to life gone, she appears frightened, alone and it is that moment of the film that left me scarred for years. The build to that singular moment when Blount's character was lost to unspeakable evil with no ability to return left me completely shaken. Ultimately, I decided not to write about Prince Of Darkness, but I share that traumatic moment with you just the same.
*
In the middle of all of this incredibly well-executed darkness, tension and the unnervingly frightful thrills came a little film called Starman. This film was by all accounts a love story, filled with love and light and hope. Back in the day, the last thing I fully comprehended was that the film was actually directed by none other than John Carpenter. THE John Carpenter of "You've gotta be fucking kidding me" The Thing fame. Yes, the same John Carpenter where a grandma stood near a fog-filled door, while a young boy sat hiding in terror. Yes, John Carpenter who made street punks and gang members in New York freakishly creepier than creepy. Why on Earth would John Carpenter direct Starman? Was he on a drug-addled binger? It was such a change of dramatic pace and a radical departure, an about face from his previous work, Starman almost seems out of place. Despite a clearly brilliant, but young career, John Kenneth Muir suggests the director was appearing "pigeonholed." One suspects John Carpenter was looking to shake it up, and perform an unexpected genre-busting, auteur-defying act by offering fans a love story within the context of the Carpenter touch. Okay, so he did Elvis [1979], the film that kick started the Carpenter/ Russell love affair, but on the whole Starman just didn't feel like John Carpenter on film on its surface. Look a little deeper and the auteur's hand is definitely guiding this alien enterprise.
*
Once again, from his thought provoking, well-researched, informative tome, The Films Of John Carpenter, Muir makes an interesting point. Carpenter's films are "consistent" and Muir references Actor Kurt Russell once making the same observation that Carpenter was one of the most recognizable and instantly identifiable of the auteur-styled directors. He points to a distinctive "personal ethos" behind his work, which makes Starman all the more curious. Carpenter made a play within the Hollywood game to change expectations up following the critical backlash lambasted upon The Thing and the quieter follow-up Christine [1983], based on the work of Stephen King, with something tangibly different from the horrors associated with his oeuvre. Ultimately, as a result of Starman's modest success, Carpenter was asked to continue his run in Hollywood outside of that trademark "ethos." Carpenter was offered other films like Fatal Attraction [1987] and H2O [1998]. But it becomes apparent with Big Trouble In Little China [1986] and Prince Of Darkness [1987] Carpenter was interested in returning to his own unique creations and the things which makes him tick. All of this leads me to believe Starman was essentially an aberration, albeit a beautiful one, under the steady direction of a special director.
*
Another reason I selected Starman was to give it another visit. Until this writing I had only ever saw Starman one time. To be truthful, I was never particularly fond of it. It never grabbed me in the way John Carpenter films grabbed me or scared the shit out of me. It just never left a huge imprint. When it was released on Blu-Ray I had little desire to pick it up or give it another try that was until John Carpenter Week hit me like a bolt from the blue. In the end, Starman seemed like my chance to analyze it through wiser, more potentially perceptive eyes. I considered that perhaps I never fully appreciated the film's substance as a younger man. The year was 1984. High School was a struggle. Duran Duran reigned and I was attempting to find love [of a sort] myself. In the end, this was my opportunity to revisit the strange film called Starman.
*
Another facet to the film was that it starred the always engaging actor Jeff Bridges. Jeff Bridges had to have been an interesting choice for Carpenter. The actor has a very natural, likable quality that is entirely comparable to Kurt Russell. I wonder if Russell was unavailable. Russell was getting busy with Goldie Hawn over on Swing Shift [1984]. Nevertheless, if I wasn't going to tackle a Kurt Russell/ John Carpenter collaboration, Jeff Bridges was the next best thing. He's had an endlessly fascinating career and I have admired his work in much the same way, both just years apart in age [Russell born East Coast, Bridges born West Coast]. Bridges easily ranks among my favorites and the opportunity to revisit one of his films I didn't fully appreciate seemed like a good idea. I thought that I must have missed something special in this picture back in the day.
*
Bridges, like Russell has a long list of films I treasure. If I had to choose favorites between the two it might be close. Russell would have the edge, but Bridges is a seasoned remarkably natural actor with an equally mesmerizing charisma. This is why I was so surprised by my lack of affection for the film when I initially viewed it. The studied, mannered, deliberate almost method-like approach to his character in Starman with his ticks and mannerisms didn't quite appeal to me then. But that was then and this is now. I might feel differently.
*
Kurt Russell's film resume is sick, but I believe Jeff Bridges comes close. For me, Fearless [1993] by Director Peter Weir and Terry Gilliam's The Fisher King [1991] rank among my personal favorites. Of course there are films like Ridley Scott's White Squall [1996] and Jagged Edge [1985] that are solid and endlessly entertaining. As he prepared for Starman, Bridges was hot property and came off minor film classics like Tron [1982] and Against All Odds [1984]. With Starman Jeff Bridges was nominated for a Best Actor Academy Award and Golden Globe Award. He took home a Saturn Award for Best Actor. He lost the Academy Award that year to F. Murray Abraham for Amadeus. He lost in good company with Sam Waterston who was nominated for The Killing Fields. Some decried injustice. We're about to find out.
*
Starman also features Actress Karen Allen in the sharing of top bill. The spitfire actress has never fully captured me even with Raiders Of The Lost Ark [1981], but again I was young and naive. There is indeed a certain likability factor to her talent. There is something raw and sexy about her. It will be interesting to see how I respond to her and the chemistry between her and Bridges. Starman cometh with spoilers.
*
A transmission from Voyager 2 requesting life forms visit the planet Earth reach deep space. Voyager 2 sent those transmissions in 1977. Well, life has received that request and arrives on Earth in the form of a Starman looking like Jeff Bridges. On Earth, Jenny Hayden, played perfectly by Karen Allen [an actress I truly underappreciated once upon a time], looks achingly, longingly at earlier film footage of her with her now deceased husband, Scott Hayden, also played by Jeff Bridges. She misses him and is clearly in a lost and lonely place without his company.
*
The alien ship is picked up on radar and jets are dispatched. The ship crashes in a fiery blaze near the home of Jenny Hayden. A bright, shapeless, blue light is drawn to her home. It is night and Jenny lays [with terrific, bare, naked legs mind you] restless. The mysterious arrival enters her home and absorbs information happening upon photos and a strand of hair from the late Scott Hayden. The creature assumes his physical appearance in a creepy little, An American Werewolf In London-like transformation. There is an intimacy to the proceedings that is both eerie and quintessential Carpenter. He brings his unique touch transforming even this picture from standard, sappy, sentimental Hollywood fare into something real and genuine on an emotional level. Jenny witnesses the alien child grow within seconds into her late husband. She is both disturbed, stunned and intrigued. As any human would react, Jenny immediately grabs her gun prepared to kill this bizarre intruder. Unfortunately how do you kill something with the face of the man you loved? She knows this thing is not her husband, but her mind is overruled by her heart and the desperation of wanting to see him again. Despite the fact it is entirely illogical, Jenny yearns to see her husband despite knowing it can't possibly be.
*
Bridges spent many weeks observing small children to master their linguistics and/or movements to capture the actions for his newborn-type reality. His performance is never static throughout the film. His transformation, as he learns, becomes more fluid, but it is ever so subtle or restrained. It is a nuanced, delicate, gradual performance that he nails. The alien visitor has come to, well, just that- visit. Bridges creates an incredibly believable, alien creature that has taken up residence within the vessel of a human figure. His movements, facial ticks, twitches are like that of a squirrel or gecko to give the impression of something entirely alien. Bridges was nominated for an Academy Award for his performance for a reason, one of the best foreign, fish-out-of-water roles that I can recall. Passed out in the corner, overwhelmed by her discovery Jenny sits in a heap, while the alien absorbs her home videos. There are sequences that play out almost documentary-like as if a study in human behavior.
*
Jenny awakens and rushes to her car intending to run. Starman picks up new objectives. Emergency Transmission. Observation Craft Destroyed. Environment Hostile. Completed Symbiotic Transformation. Rendezvous Third Day Landing Area One [Arizona].
*
Jenny and Starman ride off in her classic, orange red 1977 Mustang Cobra [shhweet!] away from Ashland, Wisconsin. The radio reports of a meteor crash. Once again, Carpenter underlines the distrust of the government entity so prevalent in his work. You will never hear the truth. Elsewhere government officials probe the crash site, while the public gets an entirely different story.
*
In a desperate effort to escape, Jenny drives her car toward an oncoming van to get their attention. A man with a tire iron gets out enraged. Jenny screams she is being kidnapped. The man with the tire iron tells Starman to let her go. Starman utilizes his awesome power to frighten the would-be savior away with a melting tire iron and an explosion. I can't help but note that this is once again a beautifully shot Carpenter picture.
*
As Jenny Hayden and Starman communicate on their road trip, Starman finds Scott Hayden's old baseball cap in her glove compartment. Placing it on his head he looks to Jenny and says, "I look like Scott." She winces and looks away at a loss for what is transpiring. It would have the same affect on anyone. This is a lovely little scene and really captures the quality of the lead performances and the connection the two characters are making.

*
Meanwhile, the government has relocated Starman's ship to a hangar for analysis. The agent, Mark Shermin [played by Charles Martin Smith], has also received information on the car and plate following their incident with the van. Inside the spaceship they find a gold disc with greetings in 54 different languages.
*
Speaking of communications, the two stop at a gas station to fuel the Cobra. How about this for a classic little Carpenter moment.

*
Jenny expresses her fear of being kidnapped by Starman to him. With the gun pointed at her head, he releases the cartridge from the gun and tells her "I mean you no harm Jenny Hayden."
*
Starman informs Jenny he must be in Arizona in three days. His people will leave without him. If he is left behind he will die. It is here Jenny is given reason to care beyond the surface appearance of a creature resembling her late husband. It is here Starman becomes sympathetic.

*
The two companions stop at a "food station."
*
Starman happens upon a dead deer tied to the roof of a hunter's car. He is compassionate and finds the human race primitive but leaves the deer. Inside the diner, Starman gazes upon a picture of Jenny and her husband Scott. He asks her to "define love." Karen Allen gives such a tender, sensitive performance in Starman when you consider her spitfire role in Raiders Of The Lost Ark. You'll look at Raiders differently.

*
Jenny exits to the bathroom planning once again to part company with Starman. She asks the waitress to give Starman her keys. She cares for him, but is interested in parting company. In some ways, she is interested in going home back to the comfort of mourning. Once again, the pain of loss and memory retains its hold in allowing us to move forward. Starman exits to the parking lot and from the diner window Jenny witnesses Starman bring the deer back to life. It is a moment of pure magic. It is abruptley ended when the hunter rushes out and punches Starman in the face reminding Starman of the unpredictability of this human race. Starman returns the favor. He is quickly jumped by three other men. Jenny Hayden saves Starman and has a change of heart as her fondness grows for this strange visitor. As Jenny peels off in her Cobra leaving the men in the dust, Starman flips them the bird and through the window mouths "Up yours." He's beginning to fit in just fine.
*
Jenny shares more of her past as the two connect. The score, provided by Jack Nitzsche, is synthetic but fittingly beautiful in accompanying the film's tone even if it isn't as perfect as a John Carpenter composition. Held over at a hotel, Jenny begins to derobe forgetting for a moment that Starman is not her husband. While Jenny bathes Starman changes channels with his hand and settles on images of love from From Here To Eternity [1953]. Seeing its principals kiss, Starman goes to Jenny's bedside to kiss her. Interrupted by the arrival of police, Starman and Jenny head off in their Cobra. Seeing Starman holding the pistol, the officers shoot and kill Jenny Hayden. Using his marbles [metallic marbles], he encases himself in a kind of alien forcefield driving the Cobra into an oil tanker that explodes. From the flames he walks away unscathed holding Jenny in his arms in another beautiful cinematic image that reminsices of Beauty And The Beast.
*
Stowing away in tractor trailer, Starman heals Jenny Hayden and kisses her in a lovely sequence. The Christ-like conceit of saving Jenny through resurrection when revealed is also well-handled by the knowledge he can restore life through the earlier deer sequence. It would have been largely convenient and a hard sell had the deer scene not been established.
*
When Jenny awakens Starman is gone. At the diner Agent Shermin locates Jenny and phones her. She attempts to ease interest in Starman by insisting she was not kidnapped, but unfortunately the government doesn't care about her. Starman has hitched a ride west with the diner's night cook. While on his roadtrip an attempted smoke ends violently in coughing. As he speaks and mimics the red neck driver one realizes Starman's only contact to date has been Jenny Hayden.
*
At a roadblock, Jenny gets a fellow to help create a diversion so she can save Starman who is about to be discovered. She hugs Starman as she escapes under a bridge and catches a lift with a passing pick-up truck. She is pleased to see him. She is beginning to worry for him. Starman is winning her over and reawakening Jenny Hayden. He is beginning to realize he is not good for her safety. I couldn't help but think about this film as a story about communication. It is the essence of relationships and this film recognizes the importance of it and why any real relationship takes time and patience and it walks through that process naturally.
*
Now on a train, the two grow closer to their destination and in turn grow closer. All wet, the two change clothes and in the process and the heat of the moment kiss and get naked. For a moment Jenny is lost in the love of her former life and at the same time realizing she is okay with the fact this is not Scott Hayden even noting slight facial differences. She is letting go. Also, in a universal way, it emphasizes the human need for companionship, contact and love in any form and that it comes to us in different ways. Doors close and doors open.
*
Jenny and Starman have connected intimately. He smiles pleased to watch Jenny sleep. Awakened, he tells her, "Strange, I think I am becoming a Planet Earth person." Jenny wishes for him to stay on Earth. He presents her with some joyous news. He has given her a baby, despite her overtures that she is unable to have children. She will have a baby boy. She grabs and holds him in love. It is the most normal, natural reaction to the news I could expect in a film. She asks which star in the heavens is his so that she may tell the child one day where her father is.
*
Jenny and Starman have overshot their destination. They are in Las Vegas, Nevada, but they will get him home she assures. With no money, the two win a $500,000 bonanza on the slots thanks to Starman's handy little power. Elsewhere officials have deducted the trajectory of Starman's ship's descent to before the crash and know he is headed to Arizona. They intend to capture Starman and study him. It is considered a combat mission. Shermin attempts reason by reminding him the alien was invited here as a result of the transmissions sent from Voyager 2. Is this how we welcome visitors?
*
In the final run, Starman expresses aspects of his utopian homeworld, but that it lacks life and vitality like that found on Earth. This is a sweet moment that also alludes to Starman's own fondness for Jenny Hayden.

*
When Starman admits to missing all of these wonderful things on our planet including the human life, we are reminded of how special these things are. Personally, I love my life. I believe I get this unhealthy obsession for it from my grandmother. At 92, she said to me recently, "Gord, I know I'm old... but, I don't really want to die." You talk about choked up. That will do it to you. I understand why she feels this way. She is a joyful, happy 92 year old. It may be a rare thing, but behold, I see it in her beautiful, prettiest eyes of 92. And this is why I enjoy life- singing, eating, laughing, thunderstorms on a rainy day- all of it. It's all good and the film Starman reminds us of what's important just as Starman reminds Jenny Hayden. He unveils the joy of life from the shroud of darkness that hung over her like a cloud that fateful day he arrived. When Jenny Hayden tried to run away to go back to the sadness that eveloped her, Starman pulled her back, a stranger who rekindled her spirit and joy for life. It's a precious thing to be treasured and Starman is all about that right down to their final, simple moment eating cherry cobbler together. These are the things in life to enjoy. At a food station, Starman and Jenny are finally surrounded by law enforcement. It is here that Shermin seeks to do right by the alien visitor. Jenny asks him to let Starman go. He must go home. Starman is a calling card to humanity for the respect of all life. Shermin creates a story and tells the officers they had the wrong subjects. Jenny and Starman make it to the crater as the aliens arrive.
*
Helicopters are inbound. Time is running out. If there appear to be similarities throughout the film to a certain other alien visitor it is not by accident, because both Starman and E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial were being considered simultaneously by the same company for a time until Starman was ultimately shelved in favor of the former.
*
As they run, Jenny and Starman are fired upon, but remain unharmed until the alien ship's arrival. Like E.T., Starman grows weaker and is dying and must return home. The minimal special effects of the arriving alien vessel are impressive and still look magnificent by today's standards. A beam of red light penetrates the air surrounding Jenny and Starman replenishing his strength. Once again, lighting is an important component in the film's climax suggesting a range of feeling and mood [See Science Fiction Images In Techni-COLOR]. The red and blue colors flood and surround Starman and Jenny suggesting a union of two worlds. The colors are warm and embracing. There is a glow of love about them and with the flutter of flakes falling about them there is something entirely pure about the moment suggested by the appearance of something akin to gentle snow.
*
Muir offers some additional commentary in The Films Of John Carpenter. "Carpenter's lighting technique in this sequence captures their oneness beautifully and has thematic value. The two lovers stand together under a beam of rich, blue light, ..., the world has turned to a fiery red hue. This lighting, which pinpoints Jenny and Starman's togetherness, also points out what exists outside the blue serenity of human connection: a red light suggestive of hell." That's an interesting take and not out of the question. Jenny wants to return with him, but he tells her she would die there. This is the sweet, final goodbye.

*
Well, E.T. never said goodbye to Gertie quite like that. I can't remember seeing a sweeter tale than Starman within the genre a more mature audience. Starman is sweet. The final shot of Jenny Hayden looking to the sky is lovely and I don't know if I've ever been more attracted to Karen Allen than I was after seeing this film. She's just beautiful. While it was terribly cruel in some ways that Jenny had to say goodbye to Scott Hayden twice, she was able to say goodbye properly to Starman. In this, there was closure for her and with their child hope for her future, which was not present when we first met Jenny. Starman is a startlingly simple film. It certainly doesn't grab you by the throat like most Carpenter films. It unravels slowly and effectively tells its little tale of love. This is an understated, everso gentle film that won't appeal to everyone, but given the right mood and a calm, open heart, Starman will find its place with you. And the funny thing is, if I had to name five favorite Carpenter films in order, Starman wouldn't make that list, but that speaks to just how damn good John Carpenter really is.
*
Starman: B+
*
Additional commentary: The film on the whole feels different than most Carpenter productions, because Carpenter wasn't involved in the music, the production or writing, which is normally a staple of any John Carpenter production. His hand is typically all over a film and in the case of Starman, he takes the Director's reins alone delegating to other Hollywood participants. One of the most significant things about the film for me personally was my essentially non-plussed attitude toward it upon my first viewing years back. It lacked all of the things I loved about Carpenter films. In some way, I think I refused to believe it was actually a Carpenter film when I first viewed it. This built-in expectation certainly didn't work in its favor. This couldn't be the same man who brought me Snake Plissken and Michael Myers. I just refused to believe it was him. I think I blocked that information out at a subconscious level preferring to believe Carpenter himself had been hijacked and abducted by an alien lifeform himself like the one from The Thing. This seemed more conceivable. Yes, I had my troubles with the film once upon a time. Now, I felt a little something different. I wasn't approaching respectability. I already had that for Carpenter. There is indeed a very un-Hollywood approach to Starman and it is quirky and weird as love stories go. But, the timeless quality of the films themes of love and intimacy shined through for me in a way now I never fully appreciated in my young, testosterone-laced heart. This was intended to be a different experience and one I can certainly accept now.
*
On another front, Starman presents human cloning pre-dating its heated discussion by years. How would you react to see the return of a loved one in this way? On another level, Starman presents a story about coming to terms with loss and how we process these things.
*
Starman was co-produced by Michael Douglas, a formidable presence in Hollywood. Several directors were considered before reaching a decision on Carpenter including Adrian Lyne and Tony Scott among them. John Kenneth Muir's meticulously researched and insightful The Films Of John Carpenter delves further into the issue of Starman's conflict with E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial as noted earlier. The studio was concerned and "shelved" Starman "fearing that the two projects were too similar in tone and story." Two scripts were being developed for years regarding alien visitation, Columbia let the other go to a rival company and settled on Starman. The other became Steven Spielberg's blockbuster, ironically embracing the same critic's hearts who ravaged John Carpenter's The Thing [1982]. In almost a doubly ironic move, the resulting box office of The Thing up against E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial forced Carpenter to re-evaluate his status working within Hollywood's game inevitably taking on Starman. Life is funny. Directing Starman was the result of that assessment according to Carpenter on the commentary track found on Big Trouble In Little China [1986]. In essence, Starman, like the visiting lifeform that was The Thing, is indeed the anti-Thing. Carpenter looked to make an entirely different impression. The film was one of the most notable science fiction film dramas of 1984 and was received well critically, if not embraced at the box office. The film, as referenced in John Kenneth Muir's The Films Of John Carpenter, was often considered the best science film of 1984. This was no faint praise with competition including Star Trek III: The Search For Spock, 2010: The Year We Make Contact with Roy Scheider as well as Dune by David Lynch in the running. Carpenter's quiet, little, alien love story, intimate on a character level unrelated to sexuality was like the little film that could against these much bigger pictures. Funny that Starman would be the only film for which John Carpenter would receive an Academy Award nomination, never winning, but then, what does the Academy really know?
*
Years ago, I think Starman left me unaffected, but as we grow older and appreciate life the days these things change. Carpenter gave us a film about treasuring life. John Kenneth Muir points to the work as one of Carpenter's most "human." I believe, in all of Carpenter's work there is hope [however small the glimmer may seem] or at least the potential for hope, but Starman is indeed the most hopeful of all or as John Kenneth Muir states, "John Carpenter on an up day."
*
Muir points to the two principals for the film's dramatic success. Starman really said something about Carpenter's ability to bring out the best dramatically from his performers. To some this may have seemed surprising, but to those intimately familiar with the details of Carpenter's work, it was always one of his strong points. Carpenter knows how to get into the head of a character.
*
Rex Reed of The New York Post penned his surprise at Carpenter's talent calling his film "A likable, unheralded surprise." John Nangle of Films In Review called the film "stiff." A descriptor I believe he mistakenly pegged to Carpenter, but more appropriately should have been assigned to the intentional performance of Jeff Bridges. Nangle calls it a "voyage to nowhere." Nangle misses the point of Starman, which is clearly like a slice of life, just as the slice of dutch apple pie meant living to Starman. Nangle's criticism is wrong-headed and quite frankly Carpenter's steady, reserved hand is truly telling. Carpenter never paints a picture that is needlessly sentimental or emotional just for the sake of pulling on heartstrings. He never goes there. The reactions of its principals and their motives are natural, understandable and logical. The character emotions are never revealed to simply get an audience reaction. Carpenter presents these characters and earns our affection for them. Sure, Starman strolls along on its roadtrip. There isn't alot of noise, car chasing and other associated violence that often accompanies today's Hollywood fare. But Starman stays with you when its over. His visit means something. Given where Jenny began and where she ends her journey, Nangle has to be dead. How could you miss the revitalization of the human spirit? "Voyage to nowhere"!? Do your heart beat Nangle? Carl E. Rollyson, Jr. of Magill's Cinema Annual 1985 offers the best summation. "This is a quiet, modest motion picture." Precisely, or as Muir writes, "Starman sees mostly with wonder and awe" not unlike a child. Bridges brings that to the part of his alien stranger. As Muir points out in his book, the alien role is a terrific "dramatic tool." He beat me to the punch by mentioning Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home as an example that came to my mind. Other "alien" concepts of a similar vibe might include films like Crocodile Dundee, and even Rain Man. These "outsiders" help us see the world through new eyes appreciating life in new ways or helping us to reignite a passion for the simple things. In Starman's case he learns of Earth living, love, beauty and marriage.
*
There is a great segment in Muir's writing whereby he compares the philosophical differences to existence between John Carpenter and Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and makes for a wonderful comparison. He points to Starman as Carpenter's vision that most closely mirrors the kind of "optimism" found in Roddenberry's work without intentionally shooting for it. Muir takes his thinking further. Starman certainly isn't all wonder and lollipops as the darker side of humanity does rear its ugly head as framed by Carpenter by fear or government agents. Muir indicates Star Trek: The Next Generation [1987], upon its introduction years later, attempted to fuse concepts of Starman into its own equation. I'm not so sure, but Muir certainly argues the point and may be right utilizing Encounter At Far Point and the arrival of Q as the example. Muir believes the Data character is also a "reprise" of the Starman concept. It makes you wonder. Data's movements and sense of discovery do reminisce of Starman. Fascinating.
*
Muir makes the point that many saw Starman as the "flip" of The Thing, but thankfully follows up the thought with the fact that it is not a particularly "illuminating" observation. I had to howl when I read that, because The Thing and Starman are so diametrically opposite that I knew my "anti-Thing" comment was easy. Better yet, Muir points to the interesting approaches both masterful directors Spielberg and Carpenter take to tell their tales. True. Muir analyzes the character of E.T. as a kind of "imaginary friend" for children. Starman, in many ways, is for a more mature audience. Muir looks at Starman as symbolic and representative of an almost angelic, "Christ"-like force to the spiralling Jenny Hayden. He is there to guide her as much as she guides him home. In many respects both characters deliver one another home. Nangle may not have enjoyed the voyage, but how could he miss it?
*
Muir discusses the directorial approach by Carpenter to Starman, which is worth noting. There is indeed a physically intimate appeal to this film. One of the reasons the film resonates so long after seeing it and why we care so much is Carpenter takes that camera in up close and personal to his principals. Carpenter has a "pre-occupation with faces and eyes" and takes the camera and places the viewer inside of this relationship. It works.

The stunning face of Karen Allen.
Muir justifiably attempts to right a wrong regarding the craft of Karen Allen. Roles like Starman or Rain Man get all of the obvious attention for their quirky, methodical, dramatic displays, but Allen's performance is special. She is adorable and believable in her role as Jenny Hayden. She really never got her due for it either. She is the heart of the story in many ways and she was perfectly cast to bring that emotion to the screen through those close-ups of her eyes and face. Muir points to the final image of the film, one of my favorites, and says: "In just one shot, Allen is able to suggest great sadness and hope, all at the same time." Amen.
*
Muir closes touching on many of the things I witnessed as I viewed Starman that Jenny Hayden was a prisoner of the past. It is all of this underlying drama that makes Starman very light science fiction, but a far more compelling human drama.