Showing posts with label Babylon 5. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Babylon 5. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Stephen Furst (1954-2017)

"It's been one hell of a day."
 

Centauri diplomatic attaché Vir Cotto, a.k.a. actor Stephen Furst (1954-2017), is gone. The actor behind the infinitely loveable Vir on Babylon 5 (1993-1998) passed away following the loss of fellow Babylon 5 actor Jerry Doyle in 2016.

Furst was the perfect foil to the much darker Centauri Londo Mollari as played by Peter Jurasik. Furst always lit up the camera with his disarming smile and light approach in the series.



Furst will also be remembered as beloved Kent "Flounder" Dorfman in National Lampoon's Animal House (1978).

Furst also starred in St. Elsewhere (1982-1988) for six seasons as Dr. Elliot Axelrod.

It was a good deal of fun covering Babylon 5 here on Musings Of A Sci-Fi Fanatic as part of my pop culture and science fiction experience. Furst was indeed a welcomed part of my daily ritual. Watching him on Babylon 5 was a joy.



Furst joins the losses of other Babylon 5 alum including Jerry Doyle, Michael O'Hare (1952-2012), Richard Biggs (1960-2004), Jeff Conaway (1950-2011) and finally Andreas Katsulas (1946-2006) who played G'Kar.

So another one leaves us. Sad to see Flounder slip away.

He was just 63.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Jerry Doyle (1956-2016)

"I call it like I see it. I don't hold back."
-Jerry Doyle-




This is a belated tribute to the passing of Jerry Doyle (1956-2016), the famous face of Babylon 5 (1993-1998) security chief Michael Garibaldi.

Doyle was just 60 years of age when he passed in July. Like my father who passed in his fifties ---Doyle left us way too young from much the same illness.

Doyle was on the right politically, a libertarian. This science fiction fan couldn't agree with him more on most matters particularly the concept of less government. Doyle released a book Have You Seen My Country Lately? America's Wake-Up Call (2010). His book tour landed him in my neighborhood that year. This writer didn't let the opportunity pass.



Taking my then roughly twelve year old son along we attended his book signing and he couldn't have been a nicer gentleman. Though I wasn't sure if consumers buying the book were fans of his political persuasion or fans of Babylon 5. It may have been the latter. It may have been the former. For me it was a bit of both and there's no doubt Doyle used his science fiction credentials to help sell his title and he should have. There's certainly not enough conservative or libertarian folks out there and he implemented his voice on conservative radio.



When I first started this blog in its infancy one of the first things I did was a very cursory analysis of Babylon 5 here. This writer was still finding his feet then, perhaps his voice and his approach on where to take this blog, and generally speaking, looking back, I don't love those entries. Still it was a lot of fun watching Babylon 5, writing about it and conversing with those readers and sci-fi fans who discovered me out here in cyberspace and waxing poetic on Babylon 5. In general, Doyle and Babylon 5 opened the doors to the blogging universe for me (along with then blogger The Finest Kind Of Pork) and made the introduction to it a great deal of fun.



There was very little noted out there regarding the man's passing. Perhaps it was a disdain for his politics by a mostly left-leaning media or his place was perceived to be a small piece of the science fiction universe. Whatever the reason I'm sorry to see another recognizable, friendly, fun and fascinating face and voice leave us. More importantly I was sorry to see the man go so young and knew one day I needed to mark the moment of his passing here in tribute to someone who was clearly a decent, principled man. We could certainly use more of them.

Babylon 5 creator J. Michael Straczynski himself noted of the man, "Regardless of whatever was going on in his life, whether it was marital issues, a broken arm, forced couch-surfing with Bruce and Andreas or other problems, he never once pulled a prima donna on us; he showed up every day on time, knew his lines, and insisted that the guest cast live up to the standards of the main cast."

There's a lot to be said about Doyle in that quality called a work ethic.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Michael O'Hare [1952-2012]

It is with some sadness that I discover late and report that Babylon 5 actor Michael O'Hare [1952-2012] has passed away.  He suffered a heart attack roughly one week ago followed by a coma until his passing last Friday. 

He is best known for the role of Commander Jeffrey Sinclair in science fiction classic Babylon 5.  The American born actor led the cast of Babylon 5 for its inaugural first year navigating a somewhat uneven launch for that opening season.

He was replaced for Season Two by Bruce Boxleitner who played Commander and eventual President John Sheridan for the remaining four of the five seasons of Babylon 5.

It's worth noting that one of the most enjoyable aspects of writing this blog, Musings of A Sci-Fi Fanatic, began with a comprehensive [though looking back not as comprehensive as I would have liked] look at Babylon 5 for my very first time and drawing reflections from that series for input here.  I have very nice memories of writing about the series and exchanging quality comments to and from with Babylon 5 fans across the globe who were far more versed on the series than your humble fanatic.


O'Hare's departure from the series was noted by creator J. Michael Straczynski to be "mutual" and "amicable."  Thinking back, while O'Hare's Sinclair was not my favorite character on the series, some of his work for Babylon 5 is notable and highlights from Season One starring O'Hare include Episode 8, And The Sky Full Of Stars, Episode 13, Signs And Portents, Episode 20, Babylon Squared and Episode 22, Chrysalis [three of the four episodes noted as the best in SciFiNow's Best Of Babylon 5 and Ten Of The Best].  One of the very best of the entire series is Season Three, Episode 16 & 17, War Without End Parts I & II as noted in the Sci-Fi Fanatic BIG 10: Babylon 5

There isn't much specific coverage out there regarding O'Hare's quality entries as leader of the Babylon 5 space station and universe that first season when there are plenty certainly worth consideration.  Michael O'Hare passed away on September 28, 2012.  He was just 60 years of age.  May your star fill the heavens indeed.

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Science Fiction Non-Fiction: Bruce Boxleitner [Babylon 5]

"When you're a new father and mother, you have all kinds of fears come up because suddenly this other thing takes over, where you don't think so much about yourself anymore. It's amazing how that energy goes to this little child, and you're not so worried about certain things; the only thing you're worried about is whether you're going to be around long enough."

-Bruce Boxleitner, who played John Sheridan on Babylon 5, Babylon 5: The Wheel Of Fire companion book, Jane Killick, 1999, [p.156]-

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Babylon 5: The Wheel Of Fire

"The meaning of a certain line of dialogue or a certain scene became more profound precisely because it was all planned ahead of time. It was an intricate story in which every detail could have significance, where watching and rewatching the episodes could provide new insight." -Jane Killick, author of the Babylon 5 companion books-

Book 5: The Wheel Of Fire.

I've been remiss in completing my look at the Babylon 5 companion books. After an extraordinary run through the five season series a little Babylon 5 fatigue had set in. Well, having enjoyed a bit of distance from the series and a bit of a break I found myself curious to discover the remaining contents of Author Jane Killick's Babylon 5: The Wheel Of Fire companion book to Season Five. This is essentially a summary of thoughts, reflections and points of interest that appealed to me while reading the guide. Since my coverage of Babylon 5 I have moved to incorporate aspects of these books directly into my coverage of science fiction films and television.

Looking Back Over Five Years: Series creator and writer J. Michael Straczynski discusses his plan for the series' phenomenal five-year arc, his planned mission of this epic story. As many comments here at Musings Of A Sci-Fi Fanatic had mentioned in the past, Straczynski planned for unexpected developments to occur inside the arc of his story. He built-in a series of "trap doors" for every one of his characters that were delivering his story, but it was the story that was central. No one person would have a deathgrip on telling that story. Andrea Thompson played Talia Winters. She exited and was replaced. Claudia Christian played Ivanova. She left and was replaced. Sinclair was replaced by Sheridan, but the Sinclair character, like the others, still remained vital to the story. Nothing would divert Straczynski from telling the tale of Babylon 5. Straczynski established many details to foreshadow the five year arc. The series is all the better for it and a pleasure to mine for those willing to invest their time.

Truth is it's something of a minor miracle the creator pulled off his dream. He planned five years and apart from a brief hiccup at the end of Season Four with cancellation lingering, Straczynski got his five. Clearly, the merits of Season Five are debatable and remain a part of the conversation. Was it successful? Is it the weakest season? It can certainly be argued that it was necessary, if not as engaging as those first four years. Some have indicated here part of what made the fifth season feel disjointed was owing to the fact missing scripts were lost or stolen by/from Straczynski and the fact that the fourth season felt rushed in the event Babylon 5 was cancelled. All of this may bear some responsibility or at least stand to reason.

Mostly though, along the way, we have pay off, after pay off, after pay off. Babylon 5 offered smart, literate science fiction and unlike so many television shows [never mind science fiction], there was a beginning, a middle and an end. It made sense and it never cheated its audience unlike plenty of series that shall go nameless. Straczynski respected viewers. How many science fiction shows can claim this? Killick points out the series had a "respect" for "the tradition of the written genre."

At the heart of Straczynski's story were massive moral implications for its characters. He invited us, forced us perhaps, to look at ourselves and ask what choices we would make if we were given a similar set of circumstances. This happened with all of the characters and certainly none more profoundly than Londo Mollari. "Choices have consequences that bring responsibility." As Killick writes, the arc of the story is the arc of the characters. The two go hand in hand. In that, Straczynski has written a carefully woven epic,a novel in motion for the ages to uncover.

Babylon 5's Fifth Season: Perhaps it was reading this book that made me realize certain truths about the unfortunate rhythms of Season Five. With the axe hanging over the head of J. Michael Straczynski he was forced to speed up his five-year arc to bring the series to certain satisfactory resolutions. As a result, Season Four suffered for it, and Season Five resulted in an entirely different vibe. There was a stride about Season Two and Three that felt so right and so perfect. Despite the climactic rush of Season Four it still easily ranks among the series best. "Season Five was going to be slower and more reflective." Season Five was definitely slower, arguably more reflective, but also less interesting on a number of fronts. The groove was indeed missing. Claudia Christian departed. The Season was less effective with her absence. The "mundanes" and "normals" story arc was, well, sadly mundane. It felt that way to me with a few exceptions. The Byron character was truly atrocious. It was like a Harlequin romance figure brought to life with a name directly referencing the Romantic movement. On the whole the material just wasn't as strong as the previous four seasons surrounding Valen, the Vorlons and the Shadows. Killick points out how Straczynski builds the questions surrounding some of his new stories in Season Four to pay off in Season Five, but the material simply wasn't strong enough.

Season Four was looking for a sense of "closure" and a "satisfactory ending." Exactly, after three strong seasons with one building upon another Season Four felt slightly compromised. It would have been better if it played out as intended. Fans can certainly understand Straczynski's circumstances, but had to note the compromises. There were external forces working against him and fans could certainly understand and respect his position. Unlike Firefly, at least Babylon 5 had a coherent, complete story by the end of it all. Killick pointed to the "mystery" and "discovery" of the build in those first two seasons. It was that mystery that drove us and enthralled us pulling us in like the mysteries of Alien [1979] and the space jockey.

I've probably beat up on Season Five enough, but I'm not done. Byron the telepath and the United Nations-styled politics just come off verbose like the politics in the Star Wars prequels. Babylon 5 has always been political by its very nature but it was just too much in Season Five. Killick calls Season Five a season working at a "gentler pace." Killick refers to Season One as "episodic," Two as arc-prominent, Three with Babylon 5 "fighting back," Four as "fast," perhaps rushed, and Five working at a "tamer pace." Overall Season Five was hamstrung with problems.

Killick points to Season Five as character-centric stories. She suggests the G'Kar and Londo elements are some of the strongest. I too would argue they are indeed the best aspects of Season Five worth watching.

Killick discusses in detail the complex relationship between G'Kar and Londo and where their relationship lands them in the fifth season. The two characters are Season Five's greatest strength.

Killick discusses the Lochley character. As much as I really wanted to like Tracy Scoggins in the role of Ivanova's replacement, she ultimately failed in selling the character. Killick refers to Day Of The Dead as a fan "favorite" episode. Written by Neil Gaiman, Day Of The Dead was one of my least favorites and I thought the storyline felt forced. Killick points to the Lochley portion as an emotional highlight and this is an example of my detached participation in Season Five. I felt very little emotional connection to the Lochley character and to many of the events in Season Five. She concludes by mentioning Sleeping In Light, which easily could have concluded Season Four on a strong note. Killick calls Season Five "difficult" and a "challenge," but never resoundingly calls it a successful one, but rather points to the series on the whole as successful. I think that is partially by design, because I don't believe most could give a rousing endorsement of Babylon 5's final season.

The Deconstruction Of Falling Stars: Although this closed Season Four, it was ultimately a fast decision and never made the cut of the Season Four companion book. Directed by Stephen Furst, the "monk scene" is my favorite portion of the episode. Straczynski considered removing the scene because it bore a resemblance to Author Walter M. Miller Jr.'s A Canticle For Liebowitz which is apparently about an order of monks preserving records for posterity following a nuclear holocaust. Fortunately he retained the scenes which could easily exist as an homage to that book. Straczynski enjoys writing "lengthy dialogue" and Season Five had no shortage. Babylon 5 moved from a seven day shooting schedule to a six day schedule which may lend further evidence as to why the fifth season suffered. The episode reflects on the idea that war shall always persist and to achieve peace within your own sphere of influence is the best one can hope. The final scene in the episode echoes this thought when Sheridan wonders about the legacy of what they have achieved. Delenn reflects one cannot worry about tomorrow, "history will tend to itself."

No Compromises: It's an ironic title as opener to Season Five. No matter how much Killick attempts to persuade us that "any doubts... are swept away" concerning Scoggins as a replacement for Christian I'm not exactly sure she delivered or that I was ever convinced. Scoggins does a serviceable job in her one and only season aboard Babylon 5 but she was presented with a fairly unenviable task. Still, I prefer ScogginS over Robin Atkin Downes playing Byron any day. Still, even Christian felt a bit wooden in her first season to be fair. With only one season to blossom the cards were definitely stacked against Scoggins and she performs admirably. Furthermore, I've heard much hullabaloo about Christian's departure yet here Killick downplays her departure as nothing more than an opportunity to work in film. Was it that simple? I'm not so sure. As for Downes, no matter how hard they tried to sell that character, I simply couldn't get past the whole Fabian vibe. No Compromises was clearly all about compromise.

The Very Long Night Of Londo Mollari: This is hands down one of the highlights of Season Five. Having said that, it still does not rank among my favorites. The role reversal of G'Kar and Londo is an ingenious move. The story redresses Londo's unconscionable choices that led to the destruction of G'Kar's homeworld. I love the focus of the episode and the redemptive nature of Londo's position in G'Kar eyes and the forgiveness afforded by G'Kar. How easy is it to say those words, "I'm sorry." Well, given the strong writing here it's always alot harder than it might seem. Director David Eagle calls the episode "a very very dark" one both figuratively and literally. Londo navigates his way from death with G'Kar acting as his "conscience" as actor Andreas Katsulas put it. Despite the dark tenor of the episode it ends on a fairly positive, powerful close once again delivering one of those classic J. Michael Straczynski arc moments. The bridge of forgiveness and understanding between Londo and G'Kar would propel their story in a new direction. Their relationship is the strength of the season. The five year arc of their connection is really something to experience.

The Paragon Of Animals: This was a Byron-centric piece and the character, despite Straczynski's fondness for Shakespeare in his writing is quite simply a bore.

A View From The Gallery: This is a solid, left-of-center attempt by Straczynski to shake things up. He made every effort to do things differently and this installment was one of the best. Best quote from the chapter: “One of the things I always do is look for ways to turn the series format on its head and show us our characters from other perspectives, since perspective is so much at the heart of the show.”

Learning Curve: Straczynski discusses his efforts to change things up, but ultimately Season Five did not work on the whole for me. “One of the things I wanted to do was try new things. It’s the fifth year, I can experiment. They can’t do anything to me if I do experiment, they can’t throw me into jail, they can’t cancel my show.” Straczynski adds, “What’s the worst thing that will happen? That an episode won’t work- that’s about it.” [extracted from Dreamwatch #45]. Well, that’s true. You said it, not me. All in all, you can respect his efforts. His reasons are sound.

Strange Relations: “The main plot of the episode… deals with the telepaths. By allowing them to live on Babylon 5, Sheridan created a dilemma for the station, which is under Earth jurisdiction. By Earth law, all rogue telepaths have to be handed over to Psi Corps.” Law, jurisdiction… therein lies the big yawn. These are the dramatic problems with which Season Five is saddled. With G’Kar now Londo’s assigned bodyguard, given their long, combative history we’re suppose to fully appreciate the irony of their new relationship. I guess. We understand, but it’s simply not as compelling.

Secrets Of The Soul: Majorities, Minorities, biases and prejudices are a significant part of the fabric of the season’s telepath thread. I think ultimately it comes off a little too preachy for my taste. It’s not as subtle as earlier writing. We also have the character of Byron embodying a kind of Christ-like figure who practices Satyagraha a la Ghandi. The episode was more than verbal intercourse between Byron and Lyta. Jane Killick's final thoughts gave me pause. Perhaps "by alienating rather than embracing telepaths, the Human race is setting itself up for problems further down the road." I couldn't help but consider American relations with Muslim Americans or the Japanese following World War II. It's certainly a generation issue.

In The Kingdom Of The Blind: "Raider activity" sent me into a tailspin. That's it I thought. We went from hardcore Shadows forces to raiders. The raiders simply didn't have the same punch. Okay, the Drakh were much better, but even that outfit never quite took off. The Drakh was a terrifically nasty new enemy, but never quite filled the shoes of those nasty Shadows. Byron's desire for a telepath homeworld brought to mind politics in the Mid-East. Once again, more telepathic-heavy storylines balanced with the more interesting Londo/ G'Kar thread. There is no question Straczynski was able to explore aspects of these characters he wouldn't have previously, but the whole vibe was a like a different animal and thus the flow of the series changed in a direction not entirely welcomed for me. Viewers certainly reacted negatively, and some moreso than me, which prompted a response from Straczynski. It's interesting but I don't agree with his remarks. "The problem is on the one hand you have a lot of adrenaline junkies who think that unless there's a whole lot of stuff blowing up, nothing's happening, and those who think that unless they know in advance that this is an arc episode, it's not an arc episode, unless you telegraph it literally and they dismiss it." Those remarks were clearly unfair to a lot of fans. There is indeed a percentage out there who enjoy the action of any series, but let's be honest, if you were watching Babylon 5 for things blowing up, I think there were better outlets. Most enjoyed Babylon 5 for its characterization, writing, exchanges, plot twists and honesty, not for the action, at least not this fan. So I think his remarks, out of frustration perhaps, were a bit unfair. It final season offered a different tone so the set-up/build and pay off formula was unique here from the previous four seasons. I wish I could be a Drakh's advocate.

A Tragedy of Telepaths: It was a tragedy alright. The episode was directed by actor/ director Tony [Leave It To Beaver] Dow. Nevertheless, Killick interviewed him for the chapter and he indicated he was concerned about the level of violence. Gee Wally, I don't know. The G'Kar/ Londo thread saving Na'Toth was good. I also recall being disappointed by Na'Toth's return. It was a bit of a letdown to see the character so underutilized.

Phoenix Rising: It's the last we see of Robin Atkin Downes and his Byron character.

Day Of The Dead: I was not a fan of Gaiman's chapter in the Babylon 5 saga, but it had moments and I wouldn't necessarily fault Gaiman for it. The Londo segment with Adira proves how far he had come. Morden returns to portend that Lennier will betray the Anla'shok. This does happen and it's a great bit of continuity. I do recall thinking the Morden/Lennier connection was an odd choice. Marcus and Lennier would have been a nice choice. I didn't feel enough of a connection to the Scoggins character to fully appreciate her segment. Regarding the appearance of Penn and Teller, Bruce Boxleitner reaffirms my own distaste for the two comedians. "They aren't my favorite comedians." He adds that Penn was "arrogant beyond belief." I couldn't agree more with Boxleitner as Penn and Teller continue to remain an overrated pop culture presence but to each his own.

The Ragged Edge: Producer John Copeland shed some light on the efforts everyone made to make Babylon 5 stand apart from other space classics. Computer technology had a lot to do with Babylon 5's ability to create new worlds. "What we felt we wanted to try was to not do what everybody else has done. This is not just Star Trek or Space:1999 or Space: Above And Beyond. Whenever they do a location on another planet, they go out to Vasquez Rocks (in Southern California). I mean it's been in a million westerns over the years, it's been in many episodes of Star Trek, it's featured in Starship Troopers."

The Corps Is Mother, The Corps Is Father: Directed by actor Stephen Furst, it was his third outing on the series behind Season Four's The Illusion Of Truth and The Deconstruction Of Falling Stars. The entry focuses on Bester as portrayed by Walter Koenig, a character I never warmed to or fully appreciated, but as Straczynski points out in Killick's book, "Bester is not a nice guy." In fact, he's a Psi-Corps snob who looks down his nose at mundanes clearly superior to all around him. The episode looks at the "unpalatable" character through the eyes of fellow Corps members who idolize him and presents an unsavory view of the man many of us quickly grew to hate. Koenig said, "God knows I hate to draw this as a comparison because if there was anybody in history in my lifetime that was a total abomination it was Adolf Hitler, but, you know, Adolf Hitler loved dogs." That's an unsettling but accurate comparison to the evil character.

Meditations On The Abyss: Bill Mumy reflected on just how terribly ill he was during the filming of this episode and several of his supporting roles in his eight episode season. He likened his fighting style in the entry to that of Green Hornet and Kato. Mira Furlan noted a strong relationship with Mumy while working on the series and found it fascinating that both could come from such strikingly different worlds and upbringings as people and yet find so much in common. "It's so strange and actually so moving, so great, to find somebody like that who grew up in totally different circumstances, but who shares so much with you."

Darkness Ascending: Killick makes a terrific point regarding the juxtaposition of Lennier's focus here and where Garibaldi is heading in stark contrast. It's also worth noting Lennier's own unique character arc over the course of five seasons. His "wide-eyed innocence" when reflecting back to Season One has been replaced by an almost severe and extreme personality shift given his mission and his relative status with Delenn. This hardening of the Lennier character is also in direct contrast to G'Kar's great story arc. Lennier went from a religious figure to a warrior, while G'Kar from warrior to religious icon.

And All My Dreams, Torn Asunder: The episode is probably best known as Mira Furlan's husband's directorial debut stateside. The Serbian born director, Goran Gajic, couldn't have asked for a more appropriate title considering he and Furlan's flight from historic war torn Serbia/Yugoslavia. Efforts by Joe Straczynski and others won him a spot under the TNT banner after being rejected the first four years due to his excessively artistic approach to film.

Killick notes Furlan's approach as she channels her personal experience from her war experience into the character and the arc of war presented in Babylon 5. As Furlan noted, Straczynski "writes these beautiful things."

Movements Of Fire And Shadow: Peter Jurasik called the entry the closest Babylon 5 got to an X-Files episode. With regard to Londo and G'Kar's relationship and the classic imprisonment scene, Killick explained these were two people who "on the surface" hate each other, "but underneath share a friendship." Jurasik added correctly, "They're well beyond friendship, they're starting to mirror each other and see themselves in each other."

The Fall Of Centauri Prime: J. Michael Straczynski calls the final episodes of the season "some of the very best work we've ever done, maybe even the best work we've done." He stated the first portion of this season allowed for these final episodes to have a much greater impact. This episode was among the very best of Season Five.

The episode is best recalled for the fate of Londo and the fateful words of Lennier to Delenn, "I love you." The relationship between Lennier and Delenn is at its most complex emotionally. Additionally, it is best remembered as the final goodbye between G'Kar and Londo. Jurasik recalled "It was a very powerful scene to do." Both actors were "keenly and acutely aware" it was the final goodbye. It was the end of an incredible partnership in science fiction. "We were saying good-bye to each other as characters, and also as actors, as friends." Katsulas admitted it was "good-bye old friend. It was very emotional." It underlines the tragic end for our beloved Londo. In film, this would be anything but a Hollywood ending and the same holds true here on the small screen. It's positively brutal.

The Wheel Of Fire: Jerry Doyle recalled the scenes with Boxleitner were emotional. Boxleitner discussed the changes in his character and how he had become more "compassionate" and less "judgmental." That's true. There was indeed a softening in Sheridan's character, a wisdom that came along with that beard and with experience. Speaking specifically to the beauty in those dramatic exchanges Boxleitner gets it right. "I didn't have any techno-babble, I didn't have any strategic, galactic stuff to say, it was just two people talking and that's where I think the really good drama happens."

It was also director Janet Greek's farewell before returning for The River Of Souls starring Ian McShane. Greek points out a number of key shots within the episode that pay homage to earlier episodes and shots within earlier seasons. Fans will get a kick out of seeking these comparisons out.

Actress Patricia Tallman offered some final thoughts on the fate of her character, Lyta Alexander. She correctly asserted, "Lyta is a walking time bomb, a nuclear bomb ready to go off. She's got so much power in her, she can destroy everything. ... with that kind of power what else can you do with the character except kill them or have them go away?" And go away she does.

Objects In Motion: Andreas Katsulas pondered the send off of Lyta and G'Kar, a conclusion to their characters and threads that worked brilliantly for me. Katsulas, too, felt it was a wonderful way to close the book on these two remarkable characters. "There's so much left to the imagination, it was a good way to wrap it up." Straczynski likened the break up of this band of warriors, so to speak, to Lord Of The Rings essentially seeing his players "scattered to the four winds."

Objects At Rest: This was the final episode of the series since Sleeping In Light was in the can during Season Four. Yet, Straczynski and the cast found it to be the saddest goodbye and the hardest and most genuine to perform.

All of the farewells, endings and new beginninngs aside, Straczynski definitely wrote in bittersweet moments for Lennier and Londo. Peter Jurasik liked that the creator did not bend the characters "too much to sentiment." As he notes about Londo, "The leopard kept his spots to the end." Straczynski intended for viewers to see that all new beginnings wouldn't necessarily start with rose-colored glasses. Finally, the Sheridan character establishes the set up for Sleeping In Light.

Sleeping In Light: Killick eloquently captured her impressions. "It is a deeply moving tribute to the show's five-year history, with a sense of reflection and overwhelming sadness as the destruction of the Babylon 5 space station and the death of Sheridan bring the phenomenal series to a close." Amen. And of course, this was the result of Straczynski's directorial hand, so there is a great deal of insight into that particular event from the perspective of writer, producer AND first time director.

Boxleitner waxed poetic on the subject saying they were shooting for "romantic." Boxleitner gets the approach right too. "Very sad.... That was a tough one. Overdramatic as hell, but fun. I'm never afraid to be sentimental. I think people want sentimentality, I really do. I think in those kind of scenes, if you're going to play them, play them, don't be afraid." It essentially ended sad twice in the end.

So there you have it, some unfinished business and closing thoughts on Babylon 5 Season Five. This one goes out to the fans of that series. I continue to hold out hope that one day Straczynski will revisit his masterwork and remaster it for Blu-Ray so that we can all revisit the series once again with a new wisdom, new eyes and a new appreciation. Until then, stay tuned for a look at the fifth Babylon 5 film, A Call To Arms.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Authentication

Advanced Authentication on Babylon 5.

It's the future and the future is now.

Remembering password upon password is never easy. In fact, it can be a right pain in the ass when attempting to juggle the many creations, unless of course you are implementing the actual assword.

Monday, July 18, 2011

SciFiNow: The Best Of Babylon 5

Michael O'Hare, who played Jeffrey Sinclair in Season One of Babylon 5, was essentially a lightning rod for fan opinions far and wide. He lands three entries in a Best list compiled by SciFiNow.

Below you'll note a few insights from those involved creatively with Babylon 5 as noted in SciFiNow #25. The issue offers a slight variation on the ten best posted at their website that was noted in this earlier Babylon 5 Ten Of The Best entry, penned by James Rundle. This list also differs from this earlier entry extracted from another issue of SciFiNow. James Rundle returns with a slight variation on a theme with this list. The Best episodes according to the magazine in chronological order are:

1. Signs And Portents. [Season One]
2. Babylon Squared. [Season One]
3. Chrysalis. [Season One]
4. The Coming Of Shadows. [Season Two]
5. In The Shadow Of Z'ha'dum. [Season Two]
6. Severed Dreams. [Season Three]
7. Z'ha'dum. [Season Three]
8. Into The Fire. [Season Four]
9. Endgame. [Season Four]
10. Sleeping In Light. [Season Five]

These are solid selections and anyone who has seen Babylon 5 in its entirety will have a hard time taking issue with these choices despite our own preferences personally for other Babylon 5 entries. Feel free to check The Sci-Fi Fanatic BIG 10 here. Of course it's all subject to change on any given day.

J. Michael Straczynski explained, "It took five years to sell that show, because no one wanted to compete with Star Trek - no one thought it could be done.... I was obsessed with this particular story."

Regarding Straczynski's selection of Michael O'Hare for his commanding lead role, Jerry Doyle, who played Michael Garibaldi, put it candidly. "Michael O'Hare- he was kind of a New Yorky, stage actor. I've never been around those kind of guys. They really are intense about the work, and I was... I did a lot of work at home and I played on the set. He didn't like that."

Peter Jurasik, who played Londo Mollari, felt "[O'Hare was] horribly miscast and [it was] probably more painful for him than anybody else."

J. Michael Straczynski explained that Michael O'Hare's departure at the end of Season One from Babylon 5 was "a mutual, amicable, and friendly separation." One thing is certain, the involvement of O'Hare and his replacement by Bruce Boxleitner in Season Two will forever remain one of those endless topics of Babylon 5 conversation.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Jeff Conaway [1950-2011]

Jeff Conaway who played Kenickie from one of my favorite childhood films, Grease [1978], and starred as Bobby in the popular ensemble TV Series Taxi passed away at 60.





To science fiction fans Conaway was certainly best known for his role as Zack Allan, eventual Security Chief, on J. Michael Straczynski's Babylon 5 [1993-1998]. He certainly wasn't a genre regular, but portrayed the role with such enthusiasm he defined the part and became a welcomed character by the creators of the show.


He struggled with drug addiction for decades until his passing. It's another sad loss to all people who knew and loved him.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

The Best And Worst Episodes Of Babylon 5

SciFiNow strikes again. It wasn't all that long ago I offered up a Ten Of The Best list according to SciFiNow's website. The lists, both provided by SciFiNow, don't match. This once again proves the point that these lists are entirely subjective and provided by more than one writer or at the very least a writer that has had a change of heart.
*
One salient point was fairly suggested by Author John Kenneth Muir over at the outstanding Reflections On Film/TV. At a bare minimum, SciFiNow covers the classics and will spend time on a classic every issue. That's saying alot when most science fiction magazines wouldn't touch subject matter pre-Transformers. While we may not always agree with their choices, at least it generates discussion, maybe debate and at the very least may give a new generation pause to check out something that was on the air when they weren't even a sparkle in their mother's eye or their mother was barely a sparkle in their mother's eye.
*
This Best And Worst Episodes Of Babylon 5 list comes by way of SciFiNow Issue #3 and a segment dubbed Modern Classic. The best 5 portion of the list does not even mirror their own Ten Of The Best list. That's fine. It's just worth noting. This list further does not compute with my own well-considered Babylon 5 BIG 10 list.
*
Without further adieu here are the two lists for your dissecting pleasure.
*
The Worst:
1. Grail [Season One, Episode 15]
2. Gropos [Season Two, Episode 10]
3. Racing Mars [Season Four, Episode 10]
4. Atonement [Season Four, Episode 9]
5. The Very Long Night Of Londo Mollari [Season Five, Episode 2]
*
Interesting enough, not a single one of these episodes made my BIG 10 list or my Close Calls. I may not agree with SciFiNow often, but I do believe these selections were fair. If I recall, Atonement was the best of these five Worst entries. Further, I completely understand the problems with The Very Long Night Of Londo Mollari. That episode felt forced and awkward as much as I understood what J. Michael Straczynski was trying to do in that Season Five episode. I just felt taken out of the drama a bit by that point, but then I felt that way about much of the forced Season Five. Having said that, the aforementioned episode should probably NOT rank among the Worst, nor should Atonement or Racing Mars.
*
The Best:
1. Babylon Squared [Season One, Episode 20]
2. Divided Loyalties [Season Two, Episode 19]
3. Z'Ha'Dum [Season Three, Episode 22]
4. The Deconstruction Of Falling Stars [Season Four, Episode 22]
5. Sleeping In Light [Season Five, Episode 22]
*
One thing is certain, while ambitious, there isn't a chance in hell The Deconstruction Of Falling Stars would make my Top 5 list. Further, Divided Loyalties is also not one I would place in a Top 10. Interesting to note, neither The Deconstruction Of Falling Stars nor Sleeping In Light [arguably deserving of a spot] landed in the earlier Babylon 5: Ten Of The Best entry. In fact, apart from the amazing Z'Ha'Dum, these select choices would not be in my Top 5. The little things in life do leave us scratching the old melons. As a fun aside, it's fascinating to see that which appeals to one person is entirely unappealing to another- life, politics, the opposite sex and even science fiction I suppose.

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Star Trek: DS9 S1 Ep1 & 2: Emissary

"The Prophets await you." Prophetic words that would inform the journey of Commander Benjamin Sisko until the close of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.
*
Secure Immaturity is forcing my hand much sooner than anticipated with the arrival of Will's wonderfully thoughtful Star Trek: Deep Space Nine [ST:DS9] Week. I was thoroughly jazzed about his analysis of the series, but ill-prepared to contribute. I've busted a move to offer my best analysis of this third series in the Star Trek franchise, behind Star Trek: The Original Series [ST:TOS] and Star Trek: The Next Generation [ST:TNG]. Starting at the beginning was my only option.
*
Proceeding forward, I'm most intrigued to see how ST:DS9 stacks up with Babylon 5. There will not be a concerted effort on my part to compare the two as I suspect I will see them quite differently, but I'm open to noting the similarities and differences having explored Babylon 5 here over a period of years. I suspect my ST:DS9 journey will be slow and labored like most of my efforts here at Musings Of A Sci-Fi Fanatic, but I hope to bring quality over quantity.
*
But what of the question of Babylon 5 versus ST:DS9? Much fan-based finger pointing resulted from the two space station-based programs. Babylon 5 ran strong from February 1993-November 1998. ST:DS9 ran from January 1993-June 1999. It was clear the two programs would stir up a bit of controversy by running in parallel seemingly mirroring their journeys. Granted, both were radically different in appearance and the concept of life on a space station was certainly nothing new to science fiction concept in film or literature, but Straczynski understandably saw it different with good reason.
*
A series of conversations and statements from the archive site of J. Michael Straczynski himself offer a great deal of insight into the controversy. "In the forty-plus years that television has been around, no one has done a series on a space station/ port of call. Now suddenly we have two within two months of each other being announced."
*
Both also had clearly defined universes with which to play from a substantive perspective. Yet, fans of both series dug in their heels and chose sides to some degree. Many enjoyed both. I prefer to enjoy the nuances and differences of two uniquely different systems of ideas. It doesn't seem implausible that one should expect some crossover in ideas and thinking when it comes to a station-based series. How much overlap occurs we shall see. Apart from speaking positively about creators Michael Piller and Rick Berman did Straczynski feel they had a hand in how it all played out? "No. Of that I am also confident. The only question in my mind is to what degree did the development people steer them? I have no reason to believe they are anything other than honorable, stand-up men. My area of concern has always been in the area of corporate influence and intent."
*
Of course concerns over copyright infringement may have had some validity that never came to fruition. We may never know the full story. Creator of Babylon 5, J. Michael Straczynski, shopped Babylon 5 around for years before getting the needed backing to get it on air. ST:DS9's pilot, Emissary, aired just weeks before Babylon 5's debut. Straczynski began pushing for Babylon 5 in 1989. It was a science fiction epic in the making. He had vision and determination. He approached Paramount [home of Star Trek]. He provided the company with a series bible, pilot script, artwork, lengthy character background histories, and plot synopses for the first 22 episodes legend has it. This was certainly enough to raise one's suspicions in 1993, especially if your name just happened to be J. Michael. Paramount passed back in the day. Years later and the arrival of ST:DS9 was upon us. While Warner Bros. announced its support of Babylon 5, and Paramount quickly followed with its own announcement of a station-based franchise under the prominent Star Trek banner. Certainly, given ST:TNG's success in syndication, it seemed like automatic money. It was a masterstroke of marketing brilliance to utilize the Star Trek name, but would it be enough? Straczynski may have had grounds for a lawsuit, but it was not a foregone conclusion he could win and thus Straczynski moved on placing his sole focus on his epic Babylon 5. "That we have decided -- for the best interests of all -- for the time being to take a mature, "let's move forward" approach does not mean that I have to pretend nothing happened. Or shut my mouth about it." Babylon 5 was his baby and required all of his concentration as he would be the sole writer for the series with few exceptions. He had spent a good portion of his life developing it and needed to see it through, distraction-free. Taking on Paramount was not of paramount importance so to speak. According to Straczynski having ST:DS9 under the Star Trek banner for Paramount was a huge selling point.
*
"The fact that the two shows were so similar at that time, one a nobody show from nowhere, the other bundled with the STAR TREK (tm) name, came within an inch of killing Babylon 5. (Which wasn't helped by A Certain Studio telling advertisers that B5 was going to be crap, cheaply produced, and not to bother.) That's one of the main reasons why it took nearly a period of four months before we finally got the go order for year one, after everybody crunched the ratings, and the demos, and decided to take a chance on it. And even THEN we were told, "The syndie market can't sustain two shows like this; you're gonna get creamed." His remarks speak to the intense rivalries between studios within the business. He knew it was an uphill battle as a result of his prior efforts with Paramount. Fans would come to know it. I suspect some at Paramount knew it as well. Straczynski's remarks point to reasons behind the delay of Babylon 5.

"There's little question in my mind that the suits at Paramount wanted to co-opt what we were doing with B5. I know that they *resented* the show because it was, at that time, their belief that they pretty much owned the space SF genre. I feel that they guided the development process in order to co-opt what we were doing. And nothing I've heard from my sources inside the studio has given me cause to think otherwise."

It's understandable with accusations leveled against the unknown Babylon 5 why Straczynski might be defensive given the record. Ultimately, Straczynski concluded, "I have adopted a live and let live attitude re: DS9." All of this gave his show an even sweeter victory in the end for its creator when it concluded five years later with Babylon 5, Season Five, Episode 22, Sleeping In Light. Many felt ST:DS9 would absolutely annhilate Babylon 5. It didn't happen and both managed a kind of Cold War-like, peaceful coexistence with their very different, complex storylines and mythologies. In the end, weren't we fortunate to have both?
*
As for that other port of call, ST:DS9 certainly had the weight of history in its favor and how it tackled new, fresh ideas for this series will be an interesting reveal. Even within the world of Star Trek franchising some have hotly debated ST:DS9 as the worst of the franchise. I suspect its deviation from the traditional Star Trek approach and spirit clearly retained in ST:TNG had much to do with it. ST:DS9 challenges in new, unexpected and exciting ways. Some have placed it at least better than Star Trek: Voyager. Still others rank it higher and place it in the esteemed category of the best of all Star Trek franchises. Of course, the debate will rage.
*
We venture forth into the world of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Season One, Episode 1 & 2, Emissary. The episode opens in flashback referencing the events of ST:TNG, Season Three, Episode 26 and Season Four, Episode 1, The Best Of Both Worlds. Captain Jean-Luc Picard, then assimilated by The Borg, was forced to lead an assault on Starfleet at Wolf 359. The Federation Starships were under seige by the Borg cube and with seconds to spare following critical damage to the warp core of Sisko's ship, the USS Saratoga, Commander Benjamin Sisko manages to escape with his son while overcome with grief over the loss of his wife killed in the attack and left behind in the exploding vessel. The wonderful tome Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Companion, now long out of print, notes these exciting battle sequences were filmed exclusively for Emissary. The scenes depicting the battle of Wolf 359 were never actually filmed for the referenced ST:TNG two-parter The Best Of Both Worlds. Budgetary reasons wouldn't allow for it. The aftermath was all that materialized. Emissary takes those events a step further building upon that intricate Star Trek mythology.
*
Three years later, long after that fateful shuttle escape, Sisko informs his son fishing on a lake they will be relocating to the orbiting space station, Deep Space Nine, off Bajor. Convinced it won't be so bad, father and son exit what begins in the holodeck room in a clever visual opening.
*
One thing is clear, ST:DS9 indubitably had the bigger budget over Babylon 5 for the special effects department, because the effects here are far superior on this particular Star Trek outing. They are more cinematic in scope and appearance. The work on Emissary garnered the series an Emmy Award for Outstanding Special Visual Effects [1993]. It's easy to see why. This was clearly a big production.
*
On the scoring front, ST:DS9 received a quietly majestic opening theme, compliments of Composer Dennis McCarthy. The orchestral arrangement sets itself apart from ST:TNG and ST:TOS, both complete with the classic narrative opening "space, the final frontier" as the series calling card. This is absent from ST:DS9 essentially signalling to viewers this show is different. The music speaks to the isolation of the station as a remote outpost. Understandably, McCarthy received an Emmy nomination for Outstanding Main Title Theme [1993].
*
Deep Space Nine will establish a Federation presence at the request of the Bajoran government following the withdrawl of the Cardassian Occupation of Bajor in which the Cardassians brutally stripped the planet of its vital resources. The Cardassian station was formerly called Terok Nor while under Cardassian Occupation. It is adorned with much Cardassian technology and architecture. But the station is clearly under some disrepair and in need of attention, thanks to the Cardassians, as Sisko acquaints himself with his surroundings. Chief Operations Officer O'Brien is assisting Sisko in the transition and warns there are still security pproblems on the station. I couldn't help but think of the Down Below on Babylon 5. There is indeed an intimate, enclosed, contained station vibe for ST:DS9 that was also well-represented on Babylon 5. Sisko tells his son they are going to have to "rough it" for awhile. Looking at the condition of Deep SPace Nine itself I couldn't help but think how perfect the larger metaphor was. The damaged station speaks to the personalities that inhabit its world. Afterall, like the station, we're all a little damaged to some degree and it speaks volumes about the kind of series and stories ahead.
*
I couldn't help but notice how much more intrigued I was with ST:DS9 over ST:TNG's Season One opener, Encounter At Far Point. Though I suspect the natural flow of ST:DS9 owed some debt of gratitude to its precursor ST:TNG, which undeniably had to suffer the most growing pains to set pace and pave the way. ST:DS9 is more promising with its pilot.
*
Sisko walks up a series of stairs to an office occupied by First Officer, Major Kira Nerys. She is Bajoran and played with authenticity by a fiery Nana Visitor. This is a seamless exchange and one I hope to see more of as the series progresses.

*
Major Kira is less than enthusiastic about the Federation presence as a native of Bajor. I'm sure one could find a few Iraqis with a similar distaste for the presence of American forces. The testy exchange is indeed intriguing and looks to provide a host of delicious character drama along the way.
*
Like any good space station with endless corridors and seemingly endless nooks and crannies, it has its fair share of questionable characters. Break-ins are quite the norm at present. Two smugglers, including a Ferengi boy named Nog, are busted by Chief Security Officer/ Constable Odo. Odo is ST:DS9's answer to Babylon 5's Chief Michael Garibaldi. Though, Odo is a Changeling, a shapeshifter able to use Terminator 2 morphing technology, which became commonplace, at the blink of an eye. Odo is steered with a steady hand by Rene Auberjonois.
*
The robbery is halted by Odo and a phaser blast by Commander Sisko. Odo informs Sisko he does not allow weapons on the Promenade. Quark, a Ferengi, enters, is played deliciously by Armin Shimerman. Now, I'm not a big fan of the Ferengi. I don't find the alien creature designs to be the least bit interesting. I'm absolutely appalled by their design actually and I have a physical revulsion toward the creatures. I tend to discount them. I'll have to get past that. All things considered we're fortunate to have Armin Shimerman in the role, because he generates far more depth than originally given the Ferengi on ST:TNG.
*
Quark informs all involved the Ferengi thief, Nog, is actually his brother Rom's boy. Sisko informs Odo to place the boy in the brig in a power play to keep Quark on Deep Space Nine. Quark walks away unenthused by the arrival of Commander Sisko. Sisko informs Kira he is open to the Ferengi art of the "plea bargain" or negotiation for the boy's release indicating in a small way how Sisko plans to operate aboard Deep Space Nine in an almost morally ambiguous fashion when required. With Quark's intentions to vacate the station Sisko needs someone to remain and has his sites set on Quark.
*
Captain Jean-Luc Picard guests visiting the station with the Enterprise-D, my son's least favorite Federation vessel. I concur. Sisko meets Picard where he informs the Captain he was aboard the USS Saratoga at Worf 359. Picard's intense expression and that information serves to alert Picard of his unfortunate past trials with the Borg and that Sisko confronts him an understandable chip on the proverbial shoulder. This, of course, points to the fact that Picard was complicit in the death of Sisko's wife that tragic day. Without misssing a beat, Picard pauses, but moves on with the business at hand- a wise decision. The exchange makes for terrific drama and once again serves to alert the audience they will not find comfort and cliche aboard Deep Space Nine.
*
Picard sets the table offering information on the historic conflict. The Cardassians ruled Bajor for half a century [I'm reminded of the Narn and Centauri scenario on Babylon 5]. Picard is an advocate for Bajoran entry into the Federation. Previously united factions within the Bajoran government, against the Cardassians, are once again at odds and internal strife is mounting. These political elements, while certainly not outside the realm of Star Trek, are more pronounced here and remind me of the internal conflicts on Minbar from Babylon 5. Sisko, acting as a devil's advocate, states the Bajorans may simply not be ready. Picard emphasizes Sisko's mission is to do everything possible "short of violating the Prime Directive" that they be readied. Picard has been briefed on Sisko's objections to the new assignment on the station. Sisko sternly points out his responsibility is to raising his son Jake as his own personal prime directive. He fears Deep Space Nine may not be conducive to that mission. Picard and Sisko, despite attempts by Picard at pleasantries, are clearly at odds as a result of Sisko built-in prejudices given their shared past. Picard points out Starfleet Officers do not always have the "luxury" of the ideal assignment. Sisko insists he is looking into civilian service possibilities back on Earth. One can't help but sense the kind of dark undertone that permeates ST:DS9 over and above the previous two incarnations of Star Trek based on this scene alone. It clearly exemplifies a paradigm shift in style and substance shaking our comfort zone.

*
Clearly, Sisko is a commanding officer that is presented with issues. He's a damaged man, as many of us are, which leads me to wonder about his fitness for the position myself. Although, I feel I've learned more about Benjamin Sisko in this one installment than anything I learned about Jean-Luc Picard through a good portion of the first season of ST:TNG.
*
Sisko makes his pitch to Quark to remain on Deep Space Nine to spearhead the effort of generating business as the stations resident gambler turned community organizer. Who better than a Ferengi? It's an amusing interaction and introduction to Quark and Odo.

*
Sisko is a player and clearly gives us a glimpse of just what exactly is required to work with the many races and personalities aboard Deep Space Nine. If manipulation is required Sisko is inclined to implement accordingly. Certainly Captain Sheridan on Babylon 5 had to play similar games. Like Sheridan, Sisko is a good man. As he points out to Major Kira moments later while cleaning up debris, he is a Starfleet Officer unafraid to dirty his hands [on a number of levels] if needed. Sisko speaks frankly with Kira that Quark gambles the provisional Bajoran government will inevitably fall. Kira, not one to bet against Quark, agrees and suspects civil war will follow. Kira believes Kai Opaka, the Bajoran spiritual leader, is the only one who can prevent its fall. The frustrated Kira indicates religion is at the core of Bajor, but the spiritual leader lives in seclusion and is rarely seen. Religion is often central to conflict. A Bajoran monk comes for Sisko, "It is time." Throughout the Emissary, foreshadowing is utilized and applied that will inform the entire season to its very conclusion. You'll need to come back and reference the Emissary when that time comes.
*
Sisko is brought to Bajor. My initial reaction of the planetary setting is one of awe. It is a beautiful place. The detailed matte work and special effects that went into creating it are flawless for 1993. One reason for Star Trek's visual success is Star Trek's preference for modelling work over CGI. CGI was used exclusively on Babylon 5 [for obvious budgetary reasons] and it's notable. CGI was employed on ST:DS9 and ST: Voyager, but the effects work in Emissary is fantastic. Minbar, Centauri Prime and even the central core portion of Babylon 5 station never looked close to this good. Presentations of Z'Ha'Dum, Mars and other external locations on Babylon 5 often looked digitized like an old video game. It's clear which series had the bigger budget and certainly that's an important factor in the look of a show. Take, for example, Deep Space Nine versus Babylon 5, the latter was exclusively CGI, while the former was exclusively a physical model. While Babylon 5 was certainly one of the best examples of that show's CGI, Deep Space Nine is a model and I love models [toy and female]. ST:DS9 has looked impressive thus far. Though, like ST: Voyager, ST:DS9 would employ CGI more frequently as the series progressed. We'll be sure to note any significant changes as part of Musings Of A Sci-Fi Fanatic's pro-modelling/ anti-CGI campaign.
*
Kai Opaka asks Sisko if he's ever explored his spiritual force, or pagh. It is the lifeforce that gives courage. She takes Sisko underground. She knows Sisko is a man in pain and implores him to look for "solutions from within yourself." She introduces Sisko to a glowing orb, a tear of the prophet. It lights the room and Sisko is transported to a beach. It was here he met his late wife, Jennifer. Sisko sees her again and he is alive reliving their introduction all over. He's like a kid in a candy store seeing her again. We are treated to a slice of Sisko's past and his emotional core. In the scenario, he has just graduated from Starfleet Academy and is overflowing with affection for his wife to be. Moments later he is transported back to the room of the orb. Opaka indicates there were nine orbs, the Cardassians have taken eight of them. Sisko must find the others. She fears the Cardassians will attempt to decipher their powers and potentially destroy the Celestial Temple. She implores Sisko to find the temple. It is a journey he is destined for and it is the only way she can unite her people. Sisko is as dubious about the reason he is chosen as we are, yet he is the emissary. He is the agent as it is defined, but of what? There are agents of good and evil. While I suspect Sisko is far from the latter it will be interesting to see how this pilot's theme carries this concept throughout the series.
*
Truthfully there's a lot of religious mumbo jumbo here and it is undeniably setting the table for a new mythology within the vast mythological universe of Star Trek.
*
Sisko visits the Promenade where a festive atmosphere is in full swing. It is teeming with alien activity. It is indeed the equivalent of Babylon 5's Zocalo. On some level I cannot help but be simply amazed these two shows managed to exist simultaneously on television. I'm awestruck by what J. Michael Straczynski was able to pull off against a powerful studio system. There are striking similarities in the set up.

*
The science officers arrive aboard Deep Space Nine. We meet Chief Science Officer Lt. Jadzia Dax, a Trill, a species which shares a symbiotic relationship with a "slug." The slug is Dax. Sisko is an old friend of Dax and knows Jadzia looks terrific joking she must be 328 years old. The race is a bit like the Goa'uld on Stargate SG-1 that are hosted by the Jaffa. Chief Medical Officer Lt. Julian Bashir is clearly smitten with Jadzia and hopes to reunite with her later for dinner or a drink. Elsewhere, Bashir is clearly overjoyed to be working out on the "frontier" and "Wilderness" where "heroes are made." The hard-nosed, reality-based Kira is not impressed with the wide-eyed, overzealous doctor and gives him a little tongue-lashing. Certainly many relationships will develop on ST:DS9.
*
Sisko puts Jadzia to work on locating the orbs. She indicates she was worried about him. He admits he is happy to see her again referring to her as "old man," because Sisko was mentored and friends with the previous host, Curzon Dax, who now resides inside Jadzia.
*
Jadzia gets to work and with a touch of the orb is transported to a place where this device lends a bit of insight into her character. On an operating table a slug is removed from Curzon Dax and given to Jadzia. So who was Jadzia host to before or was she a host at all? Do the slugs give Trills extended life?
*
Chief Miles O'Brien visits the Enterprise-D to bid farewell to Captain Picard. O'Brien is played by a true acting giant in Colm Meaney. He's a natural. O'Brien was formally a recurring character on ST:TNG and is relocated to Deep Space Nine. The farewell is bittersweet. This sequence is more emotionally profound if you understand the context of the relationship between these men from ST:TNG.

*
There's certainly a sense of one show passing the torch to another. Surprisingly, Colm Meaney's first appearance in the franchise dates back to ST:TNG, Season One, Pilot, Encounter At Far Point. The Enterprise-D exits the system.
*
Cardassian Gul Dukat arrives at Deep Space Nine. Dukat is also the character name of a character from Minbar in Babylon 5. Sisko and Dukat meet whereby Dukat informs Sisko his office once belonged to him only weeks ago. Dukat points out that Deep Space Nine is quite remote with poor defense systems implying the Cardassians could move in and take back whatever it might at any time. This is an interesting exchange and one that should make for some wonderful drama going forward by the Cardassian villain opposite Commander Sisko. Both actors are solid.

*
Jadzia believes she may have ascertained the possible location of the Celestial Temple. Sisko believes it's worth a look, but they need to get past the Cardassians' watchful eye.
*
In the Promenade one can't help but feel a sense of scum and villainy about the hive of activity there. Major Kira is certainly ST:DS9's answer to Babylon 5's Ivanova. Both are tough, no nonsense, fearless women. It will be interesting to see who is the more intriguing actress of the two. Kira shuts down the party in the Promenade to Quark's objection. Kira clearly has her beef with the Cardassians given her role on Bajor as a former freedom fighter. I see her less a terrorist as some have suggested and more a Browncoats-styled revolutionary a la Firefly. Perhaps more will be revealed. The Cardassians exit the Promenade with their winnings in a handbag. Aboard the Cardassian warship, the handbag is placed inside a compartment only the handbag is actually Odo who morphs back into changeling form. Odo infiltrates approved by Sisko himself. My only question was whether or not Quark was aware of his part in the Promenade shutdown by suppying Kira with the bag, which was actually Odo. The image suggests he may have had knowledge, but I wouldn't think he could be trusted. Still, there is the profit motive for Quark and the bit about his brother's son in the brig as motivation. I do wonder. Cardassian computers are crashed and shields and sensors are down as a result of Odo's intervention.
*
Did Quark know?
Jadzia and Sisko launch in the shuttle Rio Grande, a Runabout transport ship. The ship design is definitely a more advanced riff on the Galileo from ST:TOS. Meanwhile, Odo is beamed back aboard Deep Space Nine safely. There is clearly a strong connection between Odo and Kira. It will be interesting to see where this goes. Again, visually, this is a far less gritty work than that found on Babylon 5. The standard pristine, clean, near sterile technology of Star Trek is impressive and the visual effects are top of the line thanks to those budgets. A wormhole opens and literally gobbles up the shuttle. Contact is lost with Deep Space Nine. Jadzia and Sisko realize they are 70,000 light years from Bajor and clearly the wormhole was their transport. Jadzia indicates, "It's not like any wormhole I've ever seen." And neither have we, as the effect is impressive and unique to ST:DS9. It's fascinating to see the unique presentation of wormholes from Babylon 5 to ST:DS9 and the Stargate franchises to Farscape. They are all special in their visual concept. Sisko hypothesizes this link may have been how the orbs found their way to Bajor. Sisko is excited by the prospect of discovering the first legitimately stable wormhole to ever exist. Returning back through the wormhole the Rio Grande loses velocity. The shuttle literally lands inside the wormhole on an atmospheric planet capable of supporting life. The wormhole is the location of the hidden Celestial Temple.
*
Stepping outside of the shuttle Sisko sees a thunderous, dark, rocky landscape while Jadzia envisions flowery gardens and green, chlorophyll-infused vegetation. The two have completely different visions of their surroundings representing where they are spiritually. An orb appears zapping them upon their backsides. Jadzia is absorbed by the orb and transported back to Deep Space Nine. Sisko, too, is enveloped in bright, white light. Kira believes the Cardassians may be back on-line. Back inside the temple, the corporeal entity communicates with Sisko through visions of Jennifer, Picard, Jake and others.
*
The Cardassians are exiting the airspace and heading to the site of Sisko's disappearance, the Denorius Belt. Kira asks O'Brien what it would take to relocate Deep Space Nine to the mouth of the wormhole. Kira believes the Bajorans must stake a claim to the wormhole, while begrudgingly admitting the need for a Federation presence as well. An away team is forged led by Kira including Jadzia, Bashir and Odo. Odo has his own personal stake in the matter as he has lived the life of a Bajoran, but was originally found near the Denorius Belt.
*
Inside the wormhole, the being interrogates Sisko as a potential threat to their existence despite ovations that the human race values life above all else [well, some humans]. Sisko speaks to the beings via memories. A discussion of time and space ensues. Sisko maintains he lives on a linear time line with a distinct past, present and future.
*
Back at Deep Space Nine, O'Brien creates a subspace field around the station to lighten the load for its six thrusters to move it to the wormhole. It's a treacherous undertaking, but O'Brien is the Irish equivalent to Scotty from ST:TOS. If anyone can do it O'Brien can by God, channeling Scotty if need be. O'Brien clearly does not have the same level of knowledge regarding the space station's operations as he did the systems of the Enterprise-D. His relationship with this foreign-built station is a work in progress and should make for some interesting situations if handled with that level of detail.
*
Kira reaches out to Gul Dukat and advises he not enter the wormhole due to the potential for a hostile lifeform. Dukat plays dumb, but arrogantly suspects the lifeform may be more receptive to Cardassians. The Cardassian warship is unpersuaded and Dukat enters the wormhole where the temple resides.
*
Sisko continues making a connection with this being in the form of his late wife and they kiss. Sisko revisits the point of her death while the creature tries to understand why he cannot let go of the past if his existence in indeed linear. The away team arrives, but the wormhole collapses. The beings find the nature of human choice and existence destructive. Sisko continues his communications utilizing baseball as an analogy concerning the consequences of life. He points to his actions of throwing a baseball. A pitch can lead to one hundred different, unpredictable responses in a manner of speaking. The game wouldn't be played if we knew the outcome. This is our human existence. "It is the unknown that defines our existence. We are constantly searching." He emphasizes that he has come in peace to coexist and learn. Puzzled, the ubiquitous being insists on knowing why Sisko cannot let go of the moment his wife died. After all this moment was in the past. These philosophical questions are powerful and ST:DS9 gets the dialogue right in generating a thoughtprovoking Pilot. It eloquently asks us why we are who we are and Avery Brooks does a splendid job delivering those existential questions in his first appearance. These beings, unaffected by space and time, will serve to further add an heir of mystery to the series as the Bajorans look to these lifeforms as prophets with Sisko as their emissary.
*
The away team returns to Deep Space Nine now at the base of the wormhole. The Cardassians hail the station inquiring of the whereabouts of Dukat. Kira indicates they are on the otherside of the wormhole and that it has closed. They are unconvinced with her explanation.
*
The Cardassians flood the area with interference so that Deep Space Nine cannot communicate with the Federation. Their weapon systems fire. Kira requests "shields up!" But O'Brien asks "what shields?" Clearly, the writers work to throw off viewer expectations. The Cardassians require the unconditional surrender of the space staion or they will open fire. Kira requests one day to prepare. The Cardassian gives her one hour. If you're going to surrender, what preparations are needed for them to board? Just wondering. Just board!
*
Kira requests O'Brien shield all critical areas. Constable Odo must relocate people to safe areas. Doctor Bashir is gobsmacked that the Cardassians would ever attack a Federation outpost thinking his mission secure and free of the potential for war. O'Brien suggests he brush up on military history and make note of the Setlik III Massacre and the Border Wars. O'Brien notes Cardassians do not treat prisoners well.
*
Sisko, still under analysis, is questioned about the past. He asks for help, but a representation of the Bajoran spiritual leader, Opaka, tells Sisko only he alone will find solutions from within. It is individual responsibility that is heralded here. "You exist here," the being repeats. Brooks gives an emotional performance as the beings suggests that his past experiences from his linear existence never prepared him for such a consequence. He concedes to this. He cannot move forward. Letting go is the hardest thing to do for humans. "You choose to exist here. It is not linear." Sisko crumbles as if indicating he is ready to move forward with tears streaming. Don't we all live inside of our memories, in the past, despite a linear existence.
*
Kira requests six photon torpedoes fire across the bow of the Cardassians craft. O'Brien indicates those six are the only weapons available to them. Kira knows and she knows they won't win the battle through weaponry hoping the Cardassians won't call her bluff. A message must be sent. The shots are fired. Nothing like a classic photon torpedo right? They really need to ramp up weapons systems aboard this station. Kira is hailed and suggests to the Cardassians that the Federation has made some necessary changes. Will the Cardassians call her bluff? The Cardassians report intel to the leader. The false info received from the station points to a fictitious supply of 5,000 photon torpedoes and integrated phaser banks on all levels. Their leader suspects it is an illusion, but they are uncertain. An aide suggests getting Cardassian reinforcements, but they know Starfleet will also arrive within a day.
*
Undeterred the Cardassians take action and fire upon Deep Space Nine. O'Brien creates a pulse wave beam to suggest they mean business. Station shields are weakening and explosions are mounting. "Bloody Cardassians!"
*
Just as Kira prepares to surrender, the wormhole opens returning Commander Sisko. Dukat, in tow, signals his Cardassian warships to disarm. Damage is extensive, but the battle is over.
*
Sisko reports in the ship's log that the alien lifeforms have agreed to allow safe travel to the Gamma Quadrant through their wormhole. The Enterprise-D arrives and the Cardassians have left the building. Sisko meets with Picard whereby he informs the Captain of his change of heart leading Deep Space Nine. The two men shake hands. Benjamin Sisko is moving forward. Sisko does symbolize a sense of the reluctant hero unable to escape fate or destiny. Whether Avery Brooks proves to be the master thespian that Patrick Stewart was as Picard remains to be seen, but he does appear to be a competent choice to helm the ST:DS9 franchise. He looks to be a strong choice in a long list of terrific Starship Captains. Emissary easily rivals even exceeds the Pilot of ST:TNG Season One, Encounter At Far Point, in quality. With Deep Space Nine relocated at the mouth of the wormhole, exploration to the Gamma Quadrant allows for endless possibilties for the third in the Star Trek franchise. Politics, exploration, trade, interpersonal conflicts and war, like Babylon 5, would be at the heart of the newly established spinoff series. Further, unlike ST:TNG and its penchant for more stand alone-styled entries into its series, ST:DS9 was by far and away the most serialized of the Star Trek franchises. This, too, is similar to the serialized story arc of Babylon 5's Shadow Wars. ST:DS9 is one of the few series in the 1990s to go the route of serialized storytelling building on each successive episode more often than not. Emissary is a solid, thoughtful, challenging, ambitious opener and a shining example of what science fiction and serialized television has the potential to achieve. Between Babylon 5 and ST:DS9 1993-1999 was a potent, smart period in television especially for science fiction.
*
Emissary: B
Director: David Carson [Star Trek: Generations]
Writer: Rick Berman & Michael Piller.
*
The Cast:
Commander Benjamin Sisko [Avery Brooks]
Major Kira Nerys [Nana Visitor]
Chief of Security Odo [Rene Auberjonois]
Chief Medical Officer Julian Bashir [Alexander Siddig]
Chief Science Officer Jadzia Dax [Terry Farrell]
Councilor Ezri Dax [Nicole de Boer] [Season Seven]
USS Defiant First Officer Worf [Michael Dorn] [Seasons Four-Seven]
Chief Operations Officer Miles O'Brien [Colm Meaney]
Jake Sisko [Cirroc Lofton]
Quark [Armin Shimerman]